JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 102: 992-1003, 2009. First published May 13, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.00085.2009
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/2/992    most recent
00085.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pruszynski, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, S. H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pruszynski, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, S. H.

Temporal Evolution of "Automatic Gain-Scaling"

J. Andrew Pruszynski1, Isaac Kurtzer1, Timothy P. Lillicrap1 and Stephen H. Scott1,2,3

1Centre for Neuroscience Studies and 2Departments of Anatomy and Cell Biology and 3Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Submitted 27 January 2009; accepted in final form 7 May 2009

The earliest neural response to a mechanical perturbation, the short-latency stretch response (R1: 20–45 ms), is known to exhibit "automatic gain-scaling" whereby its magnitude is proportional to preperturbation muscle activity. Because gain-scaling likely reflects an intrinsic property of the motoneuron pool (via the size-recruitment principle), counteracting this property poses a fundamental challenge for the nervous system, which must ultimately counter the absolute change in load regardless of the initial muscle activity (i.e., show no gain-scaling). Here we explore the temporal evolution of gain-scaling in a simple behavioral task where subjects stabilize their arm against different background loads and randomly occurring torque perturbations. We quantified gain-scaling in four elbow muscles (brachioradialis, biceps long, triceps lateral, triceps long) over the entire sequence of muscle activity following perturbation onset—the short-latency response, long-latency response (R2: 50–75 ms; R3: 75–105 ms), early voluntary corrections (120–180 ms), and steady-state activity (750–1250 ms). In agreement with previous observations, we found that the short-latency response demonstrated substantial gain-scaling with a threefold increase in background load resulting in an approximately twofold increase in muscle activity for the same perturbation. Following the short-latency response, we found a rapid decrease in gain-scaling starting in the long-latency epoch (~75-ms postperturbation) such that no significant gain-scaling was observed for the early voluntary corrections or steady-state activity. The rapid decrease in gain-scaling supports our recent suggestion that long-latency responses and voluntary control are inherently linked as part of an evolving sensorimotor control process through similar neural circuitry.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. H. Scott, Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Botterell Hall, Room 232, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada (E-mail: steve{at}biomed.queensu.ca)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.