JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 102: 1632-1646, 2009. First published June 17, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.91120.2008
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/3/1632    most recent
91120.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chakrabarti, S.
Right arrow Articles by Alloway, K. D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chakrabarti, S.
Right arrow Articles by Alloway, K. D.

Differential Response Patterns in the SI Barrel and Septal Compartments During Mechanical Whisker Stimulation

Shubhodeep Chakrabarti and Kevin D. Alloway

Department of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania

Submitted 7 October 2008; accepted in final form 12 December 2009

Abstract

A growing body of evidence suggests that the barrel and septal regions in layer IV of rat primary somatosensory (SI) cortex may represent separate processing channels. To assess this view, pairs of barrel and septal neurons were recorded simultaneously in the anesthetized rat while a 4 x 4 array of 16 whiskers was mechanically stimulated at 4, 8, 12, and 16 Hz. Compared with barrel neurons, regular-spiking septal neurons displayed greater increases in response latencies as the frequency of whisker stimulation increased. Cross-correlation analysis indicated that the incidence and strength of neuronal coordination varied with the relative spatial configuration (within vs. across rows) and compartmental location (barrel vs. septa) of the recorded neurons. Barrel and septal neurons were strongly coordinated if both neurons were in close proximity and resided in the same row. Some barrel neurons were weakly coordinated, but only if they resided in the same row. By contrast, the strength of coordination among pairs of septal neurons did not vary with their spatial proximity or their spatial configuration within the arcs and rows of the barrel field. These differential responses provide further support for the view that the barrel and septal regions represent the cortical gateway for processing streams that encode specific aspects of the sensorimotor information associated with whisking behavior.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. D Alloway, Neural and Behavioral Sciences, H109, Hershey Medical Ctr., 500 University Dr., Hershey, PA 17033-2255 (E-mail: kda1{at}psu.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.