HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J Neurophysiol 102: 1902-1910, 2009. First published July 15, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.00013.2009
0022-3077/09 $8.00

This Article Free upon publication Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Material All Versions of this Article: 102/3/1902    most recent 00013.2009v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Howard, I. S. Articles by Wolpert, D. M. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Howard, I. S. Articles by Wolpert, D. M.

Statistics of Natural Movements Are Reflected in Motor Errors

¹Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and ²Physiology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois

Submitted 6 January 2009; accepted in final form 9 July 2009

Abstract

Humans use their arms to engage in a wide variety of motor tasks during everyday life. However, little is known about the statistics of these natural arm movements. Studies of the sensory system have shown that the statistics of sensory inputs are key to determining sensory processing. We hypothesized that the statistics of natural everyday movements may, in a similar way, influence motor performance as measured in laboratory-based tasks. We developed a portable motion-tracking system that could be worn by subjects as they went about their daily routine outside of a laboratory setting. We found that the well-documented symmetry bias is reflected in the relative incidence of movements made during everyday tasks. Specifically, symmetric and antisymmetric movements are predominant at low frequencies, whereas only symmetric movements are predominant at high frequencies. Moreover, the statistics of natural movements, that is, their relative incidence, correlated with subjects' performance on a laboratory-based phase-tracking task. These results provide a link between natural movement statistics and motor performance and confirm that the symmetry bias documented in laboratory studies is a natural feature of human movement.