JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 102: 1921-1929, 2009. First published July 8, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.00331.2009
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/3/1921    most recent
00331.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dhruv, N. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lennie, P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dhruv, N. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lennie, P.

Nonlinear Signal Summation in Magnocellular Neurons of the Macaque Lateral Geniculate Nucleus

Neel T. Dhruv1, Chris Tailby1, Sach H. Sokol1, Najib J. Majaj1 and Peter Lennie1,2

1Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York City; and 2Center for Visual Science and the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York

Submitted 15 April 2009; accepted in final form 2 July 2009

Abstract

Magnocellular (M-), but not parvocellular (P-), neurons of the macaque lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) differ distinctively in their responses to counterphase-modulated and drifting gratings. Relative to stimulation with drifting gratings, counterphase modulation reduces the responses of M- cells in a band around 25 Hz, producing a "notch" in the temporal modulation transfer function (tMTF). The notch is prominent in nearly every M- cell with little variation in the temporal frequency at which it is deepest. The machinery responsible for the notch lies mostly outside the classical linear center. Directly driving the notching mechanism with annular gratings evokes no linear response but elicits a second harmonic (F2) modulation of the discharge accompanied by a drop in the mean discharge (F0). Analysis of the S- potential, which reveals inputs from ganglion cells, shows that 1) tMTFs of the afferent retinal ganglion cells are not notched and 2) during stimulation with annular gratings, the second harmonic component is present, but the drop in the F0 is largely absent from the responses of parasol ganglion cells. These results suggest that the notch is caused by the combined action of the linear response and the second harmonic response, both inherited from retina, and a suppression that originates after the retina. Our results reveal a distinctive signal transformation in the LGN and they show that nearly every M- cell exhibits a spatial nonlinearity like that observed in Y cells of the cat.


Present address and address for reprint requests and other correspondence: N. Dhruv, Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, 11-43 Bath St., London EC1V 9EL, UK (E-mail: n.dhruv{at}ucl.ac.uk)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.