JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 102: 2334-2341, 2009. First published August 19, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.00125.2009
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/4/2334    most recent
00125.2009v2
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ford, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Everling, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ford, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Everling, S.

RESEARCH-ARTICLE

Neural Activity in Primate Caudate Nucleus Associated With Pro- and Antisaccades

Kristen A. Ford2 and Stefan Everling1,2,3

1Department of Physiology and Pharmacology and 2Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Western Ontario; and 3The Centre for Brain and Mind, Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada

Submitted 11 February 2009; accepted in final form 4 August 2009

ABSTRACT

The basal ganglia (BG) play a central role in movement and it has been demonstrated that the discharge rate of neurons in these structures are modulated by the behavioral context of a given task. Here we used the antisaccade task, in which a saccade toward a flashed visual stimulus must be inhibited in favor of a saccade to the opposite location, to investigate the role of the caudate nucleus, a major input structure of the BG, in flexible behavior. In this study, we recorded extracellular neuronal activity while monkeys performed pro- and antisaccade trials. We identified two populations of neurons: those that preferred contralateral saccades (CSNs) and those that preferred ipsilateral saccades (ISNs). CSNs increased their firing rates for prosaccades, but not for antisaccades, and ISNs increased their firing rates for antisaccades, but not for prosaccades. We propose a model in which CSNs project to the direct BG pathway, facilitating saccades, and ISNs project to the indirect pathway, suppressing saccades. This model suggests one possible mechanism by which these neuronal populations could be modulating activity in the superior colliculus.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. Everling, The Centre for Brain and Mind, Robarts Research Institute, 100 Perth Drive, London, Ontario N6A 5K8, Canada (E-mail: severlin{at}uwo.ca).







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.