JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 102: 2423-2434, 2009. First published August 19, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.00372.2009
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/4/2423    most recent
00372.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Legrain, V.
Right arrow Articles by García-Larrea, L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Legrain, V.
Right arrow Articles by García-Larrea, L.

RESEARCH-ARTICLE

Involuntary Orienting of Attention to Nociceptive Events: Neural and Behavioral Signatures

Valéry Legrain1, Caroline Perchet2,3 and Luis García-Larrea2,3

1Unité de Réadaptation et de Médecine physique (READ), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve and Brussels, Belgium; 2Institut national de la Santé et de la Recherche médicale, Central Integration of Pain Unit (U879), Lyon; and 3Université Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, Lyon, France

Submitted 28 April 2009; accepted in final form 13 August 2009

ABSTRACT

Pain can involuntarily capture attention and disrupt pain-unrelated cognitive activities. The brain mechanisms of these effects were explored by laser- and visual-evoked potentials. Consecutive nociceptive laser stimuli and visual stimuli were delivered in pairs. Subjects were instructed to ignore nociceptive stimuli while performing a task on visual targets. Because involuntary attention is particularly sensitive to novelty, in some trials (17%), unexpected laser stimuli were delivered on a different hand area (location-deviant) relative to the more frequent standard laser stimuli. Compared with frequent standard laser stimuli, deviant stimuli enhanced all nociceptive-evoked brain potentials (laser N1, N2, P2a, P2b). Deviant laser stimuli also decreased the amplitude of late latency–evoked responses (visual N2-P3) to the subsequent visual targets and delayed reaction times to them. The data confirm that nociceptive processing competes with pain-unrelated cognitive activities for attentional resources and that concomitant nociceptive events affect behavior by depressing attention allocation to ongoing cognitive processing. The laser-evoked potential magnitude reflected the engagement of attention to the novel nociceptive stimuli. We conclude that the laser-evoked potentials index the activity of a neural system involved in the detection of novel salient stimuli in order to focus attention and prioritize action to potentially damaging dangers.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: V. Legrain, Unité READ, Faculté de Médecine, Université catholique de Louvain, UCL 53.75, Avenue Mounier 53, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium (E-mail: valery.legrain{at}uclouvain.be).







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.