HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 102/4/2435    most recent 00684.2009v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Ong, W. S. Articles by Bisley, J. W. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ong, W. S. Articles by Bisley, J. W.

RESEARCH-ARTICLE

Psychophysical Evidence for Spatiotopic Processing in Area MT in a Short-Term Memory for Motion Task

¹Department of Neurobiology and ²Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California–Los Angeles; ³Interdepartmental PhD Program for Neuroscience and ⁴Department of Psychology and the Brain Research Institute, University of California–Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; and ⁵Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China

Submitted 31 July 2009; accepted in final form 13 August 2009

ABSTRACT

The middle temporal (MT) area has long been established as a cortical area involved in the encoding of motion information and has been thought to do so in retinotopic coordinates. It was previously shown that memory for motion has a spatial component by demonstrating that subjects do significantly worse on a match-to-sample task when the stimuli to be compared were spatially separated. The distance at which performance deteriorated (the critical spatial separation) increased at increasing eccentricities, suggesting that area MT was involved in the process. In this study, we asked whether optimal performance occurred when the stimuli were in the same retinotopic or spatiotopic coordinates. We found that the performance was best when the stimuli appeared in the same location in space rather than the same retinal location, after an eye movement. We also found that the relationship between retinal eccentricity and the critical spatial separation approximated that of area MT, as found previously. We conclude that area MT plays an important role in the memory for motion process and that this is carried out in spatiotopic coordinates. This conclusion supports the hypothesis that MT processing may have a spatiotopic component.