JN Watch the video to see how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 102: 2974-2981, 2009. First published September 16, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.00411.2009
0022-3077/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Figures
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/5/2974    most recent
00411.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clifford, C. W. G.
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, J. S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clifford, C. W. G.
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, J. S.

RESEARCH-ARTICLE

Radial Biases in the Processing of Motion and Motion-Defined Contours by Human Visual Cortex

Colin W. G. Clifford1,2, Damien J. Mannion1,2 and J. Scott McDonald1

1School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales; and 2Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Vision Science

Submitted 13 May 2009; accepted in final form 8 September 2009

ABSTRACT

Luminance gratings reportedly produce a stronger functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) signal in those parts of the retinotopic cortical maps where they are oriented radially to the point of fixation. We sought to extend this finding by examining anisotropies in the response of cortical areas V1–V3 to motion-defined contour stimuli. fMRI at 3 Tesla was used to measure the BOLD signal in the visual cortex of six human subjects. Stimuli were composed of strips of spatial white noise texture presented in an annular window. The texture in alternate strips moved in opposite directions (left–right or up–down). The strips themselves were static and tilted 45° left or right from vertical. Comparison with maps of the visual field obtained from phase-encoded retinotopic analysis revealed systematic patterns of radial bias. For motion, a stronger response to horizontal was evident within V1 and along the borders between V2 and V3. For orientation, the response to leftward tilted contours was greater in left dorsal and right ventral V1–V3. Radial bias for the orientation of motion-defined contours analogous to that reported previously for luminance gratings could reflect cue-invariant processing or the operation of distinct mechanisms subject to similar anisotropies in orientation tuning. Radial bias for motion might be related to the phenomenon of "motion streaks," whereby temporal integration by the visual system introduces oriented blur along the axis of motion. We speculate that the observed forms of radial bias reflect a common underlying anisotropy in the representation of spatiotemporal image structure across the visual field.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: C.W.G. Clifford, School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia (E-mail: colinc{at}psych.usyd.edu.au).







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the The American Physiological Society.