JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 38: 19-25, 1975;
0022-3077/75 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Tapper, D. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Tapper, D. N.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 38, Issue 1 19-25, Copyright © 1975 by APS


ARTICLES

Parametric studies of dorsal horn neurons responding to tactile stimulation

P. B. Brown, J. L. Fuchs and D. N. Tapper

Dorsal horn neurons responding to tactile input were recorded in segments L3-S2 of unanesthetized, low-spinal cats. Single units were characterized with regard to receptive field (RF) location, RF size and shape, spontaneous discharge rate, central delay, and convergence of four tactile afferent types. 1. RF size increased from the toes to the calf region. 2. Length-width ratio increased from the toes to the calf and declined from the calf to the hip. 3. The relation between RF size and position on the limb was independent of segmental and laminar location of the neurons. 4. RF size was positively correlated with spontaneous discharge rate. 5. The relation between RF size and shape and RF position can be interpreted in terms of regional variations in the magnitude of the gradient of representation in the dorsal horn somatotopic map. 6. Central delay was negatively correlated with both RF size and rate of ongoing discharge. 7. There were no statistically significant differences among the laminae with respect to central delay, RF size or shape, ongoing discharge, or convergence combinations of the four tactile afferent systems. 8. Data presented were at variance with Wall's laminar cascading model for laminae IV-VI. Our results suggest that the model should be modified, at least to emphasize monosynaptic tactile input to all three of these laminae.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online