JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 38: 492-501, 1975;
0022-3077/75 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (63)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wetzel, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Stuart, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wetzel, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Stuart, D. C.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 38, Issue 3 492-501, Copyright © 1975 by APS


ARTICLES

Neural implications of different profiles between treadmill and overground locomotion timings in cats

M. C. Wetzel, A. E. Atwater, J. V. Wait and D. C. Stuart

A cinematographic comparison of treadmill and overground performances by the cat revealed considerable flexibility in the neural control program for locomotion. For the single limb's step cycle, swing duration (time foot is off the surface) was approximately equal in both situations, as has been found previously. Subcomponents of the swing (flexion duration and timings between joints during the transition from flexion to extension) differed, however. Interlimb timings also responded to situation. The interval between touchdown of one hindlimb and the ipsilateral forelimb was reduced for treadmill stepping. An ipsilateral coupling interval also differed that had been previously reported to involve propriospinal activity, the time for onset of extension during the swing phase of the hindlimb to the onset of flexion at the beginning of the swing phase in the forelimb. Segmental afferent input, visual and other suprasegmental inputs, and motivational variables probably all contribute to the separation of treadmill and overground timing profiles.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
L. D. Maes, M. Herbin, R. Hackert, V. L. Bels, and A. Abourachid
Steady locomotion in dogs: temporal and associated spatial coordination patterns and the effect of speed
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2008; 211(1): 138 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
D. C. Dunbar
Stabilization and mobility of the head and trunk in vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) during treadmill walks and gallops
J. Exp. Biol., December 1, 2004; 207(25): 4427 - 4438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online