Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 38, Issue 3 690-713, Copyright © 1975 by APS

ARTICLES

Responses to visual stimulation and relationship between visual, auditory, and somatosensory inputs in mouse superior colliculus

U. C. Drager and D. H. Hubel

The superior colliculus was studied in anesthetized mice by recording from single cells and from unit clusters. The topographic representation of the visual filed was similar to what has been found in other mammals, with the temporal part of the contralateral visual field projecting posteriorly and the inferior visual field projecting laterally. At the anterior margin of the tectum receptive fields recorded through the contralateral eye and invaded the ipsilateral visual hemifield for up to 35 degrees, suggesting that the entire visual field through one eye is represented on the contralateral superior colliculus. Cells located closest to the tectal surface had relatively small receptive fields, averaging 9 degrees in center diameter; field sizes increased steadily with depth. The prevailing cell type in the stratum zonal and superficial gray responded best to a small dark or light object of any shape moved slowly through the receptive-field center or to turning a small stationary spot on or off. Large objects or diffuse light were usually much less effective. Less than one-quarter of superficial layer cells showed directional selectivity to a moving object, the majority of these favoring up and nasal movement. The chief visual cell type in the stratum opticum and upper part of the intermediate gray resembled in the newness neurons described for many other vertebrates: they had large receptive fields and responded best to up and nasal movement of a small dark or light object, whose optimal size was similar to the optimum for upper-layer cells. If the same part of the receptive field was repeatedly stimulated there was a marked tendency to habituate. Only very few cels responded to the ipsilateral eye. Intermixed with visual cells in the upper part of the intermediate gray were cells that responded to somatosensory or auditory stimuli. Here bimodal and trimodal cells were also seen. In deeper layers somatosensory and auditory modalities tended to take over. These two modalities were not segregated into sublayers but rather seemed to be arranged in clusters. Responses to somatosensory and auditory stimuli were brisk, showing little habituation to repeated stimulation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Cang, L. Wang, M. P. Stryker, and D. A. Feldheim Roles of Ephrin-As and Structured Activity in the Development of Functional Maps in the Superior Colliculus J. Neurosci., October 22, 2008; 28(43): 11015 - 11023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Haustead, S. S. Lukehurst, G. T. Clutton, C. A. Bartlett, S. A. Dunlop, C. A. Arrese, R. M. Sherrard, and J. Rodger Functional Topography and Integration of the Contralateral and Ipsilateral Retinocollicular Projections of Ephrin-A-/- Mice J. Neurosci., July 16, 2008; 28(29): 7376 - 7386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Goddard, E. I. Knudsen, and J. R. Huguenard Intrinsic Excitability of Cholinergic Neurons in the Rat Parabigeminal Nucleus J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3486 - 3493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Yang and T. E. Hullar Relationship of Semicircular Canal Size to Vestibular-Nerve Afferent Sensitivity in Mammals J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3197 - 3205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Razak and S. L. Pallas Neural Mechanisms of Stimulus Velocity Tuning in the Superior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 3573 - 3589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Skaliora, T. P. Doubell, N. P. Holmes, F. R. Nodal, and A. J. King Functional Topography of Converging Visual and Auditory Inputs to Neurons in the Rat Superior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2004; 92(5): 2933 - 2946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. R. Manger, I. Masiello, and G. M. Innocenti Areal Organization of the Posterior Parietal Cortex of the Ferret (Mustela putorius) Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2002; 12(12): 1280 - 1297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Lessard, F. Lepore, J. Villemagne, and M. Lassonde Sound localization in callosal agenesis and early callosotomy subjects: brain reorganization and/or compensatory strategies Brain, May 1, 2002; 125(5): 1039 - 1053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. D. Horwitz and W. T. Newsome Target Selection for Saccadic Eye Movements: Direction-Selective Visual Responses in the Superior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2001; 86(5): 2527 - 2542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Knudsen Early auditory experience aligns the auditory map of space in the optic tectum of the barn owl Science, November 25, 1983; 222(4626): 939 - 942. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Newman and P. Hartline Integration of visual and infrared information in bimodal neurons in the rattlesnake optic tectum Science, August 14, 1981; 213(4509): 789 - 791. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Gaither and B. Stein Reptiles and mammals use similar sensory organizations in the midbrain Science, August 10, 1979; 205(4406): 595 - 597. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Feng, J. Simmons, and S. Kick Echo detection and target-ranging neurons in the auditory system of the bat Eptesicus fuscus Science, November 10, 1978; 202(4368): 645 - 648. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Hartline, L Kass, and M. Loop Merging of modalities in the optic tectum: infrared and visual integration in rattlesnakes Science, March 17, 1978; 199(4334): 1225 - 1229. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Chalupa and R. Rhoades Directional selectivity in hamster superior colliculus is modified by strobe-rearing but not by dark-rearing Science, March 3, 1978; 199(4332): 998 - 1001. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Knudsen, M Konishi, and J. Pettigrew Receptive fields of auditory neurons in the owl Science, December 23, 1977; 198(4323): 1278 - 1280. [Abstract] [PDF]