JN Miami Valley Hospital
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 38: 1099-1113, 1975;
0022-3077/75 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tretter, F.
Right arrow Articles by Singer, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tretter, F.
Right arrow Articles by Singer, W.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 38, Issue 5 1099-1113, Copyright © 1975 by APS

ARTICLES

Cat parastriate cortex: a primary or secondary visual area

F. Tretter, M. Cynader and W. Singer

The purpose of this study was to determine to what extent the cat parastriate cortex processes afferent geniculate activity in a way similar to that in area 17. The area explored was located on the lateral gyrus between the Horsley-Clarke coordinates A1 to 4 and L3 to 4. The receptive-field properties of area 18 cells and their responses to electrical stimulation of afferent and efferent pathways were measured with the same methods as described previously in area 17. Mutual correlations among these items were calculated and compared with the respective data from area 17. The results of this correlative analysis revealed numerous similarities between the two areas with regard to their afferent and efferent connections and their intrinsic organization. Consequently, the structure of the receptive fields and their numerical distribution resembled those in area 17. The same was true for the correlations between receptive-field parameters and afferent and efferent connectivity. The main differences were that area 18 cells had larger receptive fields and responded to considerably higher stimulus velocities. It is suggest-d that these differences are caused by the fact that area 18 receives subcortical afferents of the Y-type, whereas the dominant input to area 17 comes from the X-system. It is concluded that the area investigated in this study is organized in parallel to area 17 and deals with other aspects of visual information than area 17.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 NeuroscientistHome page
S. D. Van Hooser
Similarity and Diversity in Visual Cortex: Is There a Unifying Theory of Cortical Computation?
Neuroscientist, December 1, 2007; 13(6): 639 - 656.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
P. C. Murphy, S. G. Duckett, and A. M. Sillito
Comparison of the Laminar Distribution of Input from Areas 17 and 18 of the Visual Cortex to the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus of the Cat
J. Neurosci., January 15, 2000; 20(2): 845 - 853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Martinez-Conde, J. Cudeiro, K. L. Grieve, R. Rodriguez, C. Rivadulla, and C. Acuna
Effects of Feedback Projections From Area 18 Layers 2/3 to Area 17 Layers 2/3 in the Cat Visual Cortex
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1999; 82(5): 2667 - 2675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Brecht, W. Singer, and A. K. Engel
Correlation Analysis of Corticotectal Interactions in the Cat Visual System
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1998; 79(5): 2394 - 2407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online