JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 39: 102-108, 1976;
0022-3077/76 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eccles, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Willey, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eccles, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Willey, T. J.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 39, Issue 1 102-108, Copyright © 1976 by APS


ARTICLES

Medial reticular and perihypoglossal neurons projecting to cerebellum

J. C. Eccles, R. A. Nicoll, D. W. Schwarz, H. Taborkova and T. J. Willey

Almost 10% of neurons in the medial reticular nucleus or adjacent thereto were invaded antidromically in response to stimulation of the fastigial and interpositus nuclei. The fraction was 77/835 for the bulbar and caudal pontine levels, but 0/167 for rostral pontine levels. The mahority, 49, of the neurons projecting to the cerebellum were superficially located in the region of the perihypoglossal nucleus, but 23 were scattered through the medial reticular nucleus, being 2.5-5.0 mm below the bulbopontine dorsum. Both classes of cerebellopetal neurons had a similar range of antidromic latencies, usually from 0.8 to 2.0 ms, but some were ober 3 ms. Both classes responded to volleys from limb nerves and inputs from cutaneous mechanoreceptors, with ranges of excitatory and inhibitory latencies that were similar to those for other medial reticular neurons. It is conjectured that the axonal projection is primarily to the cerebellar cortex and that the branches to the nuclei are often slender, hence the long antidromic latencies; 31 of 59 neurons tested projected to cerebellar nuclei on both sides, often with a considerable latency differential. Rarely, there were also axonal branches projecting up the central tegmental tract. The experimental findings are in very good accord with the anatomical descriptions of Brodal and associates (4, 5, 8, 19). It is suggested that the paramedian reticular and the perihypoglossal nuclei may provide a background excitatory input to the interpositus nuclei.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online