|
|
||||||||
Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 39, Issue 1 179-194, Copyright © 1976 by APS
ARTICLES |
R. Britt and A. Starr
Responses of 99 cochlear nucleus cells and 24 cochlear nerve fibers were studied with FM signals; 14 cochlear nerve fibers and 57 cochlear nucleus cells were studied at four rates of modulation and several signal intensities. Classification of FM response patterns as symmetrical, asymmetrical, or unidirectional was based on the calculation of a symmetry factor (S), which compared the number of discharges evoked by the ascending and by the descending phases of the FM sweep. Certain FM response patterns could not adequately be described by the symmetry factor along and variables of modulation rate and signal intensity had significant influence. A correspondence was found between the four response classes evoked by a steady-frequency tone burst (primarylike, buildup, onset, and pause) and the FM response pattern. Cochlear nerve fibers showed symmetrical response patterns to FM stimulation. Primarylike units were similar to eighth nerve fibers and generally showed symmetrical FM responses. Occasional eighth nerve fibers and primarylike cells developed asymmetry at the fastest rate of modulation (50 sps). Buildup units showed a variety of response patterns to FM signals. Onset units generally showed asymmetrical response patterns with the greater response occurring to the ascending than to the descending phase of the FM sweep. Pause units showed a characteristic inhibition of activity at 5 sps (rate-dependent inhibition). Of the 57 cochlear nuclear cells studied in response to FM signals, 16 were symmetrical, another 16 were symmetrical except at the fastest modulation rate, 12 were asymmetrical, 3 were unidirectional, and 10 showed complex responses to certain signal rates or intensities. It is clear the the cat cochlear with its complex cytoarchitecture is involved in the recoding of acoustic information. Some units in cochlear nucleus demonstrate differential responses to the direction and to the rate of frequency movement. Other cochlear nucleus cells respond as eighth nerve fibers and may serve as simple "relays" in transmitting information from the cochlea to higher auditory centers.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. X. Gittelman, N. Li, and G. D. Pollak Mechanisms Underlying Directional Selectivity for Frequency-Modulated Sweeps in the Inferior Colliculus Revealed by In Vivo Whole-Cell Recordings J. Neurosci., October 14, 2009; 29(41): 13030 - 13041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Brown and R. V. Harrison Responses of Neurons in Chinchilla Auditory Cortex to Frequency-Modulated Tones J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2009; 101(4): 2017 - 2029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Washington and J. S. Kanwal DSCF Neurons Within the Primary Auditory Cortex of the Mustached Bat Process Frequency Modulations Present Within Social Calls J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2008; 100(6): 3285 - 3304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Tollin The Lateral Superior Olive: A Functional Role in Sound Source Localization Neuroscientist, April 1, 2003; 9(2): 127 - 143. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. E. O'Neill and W. O. Brimijoin Directional Selectivity for FM Sweeps in the Suprageniculate Nucleus of the Mustached Bat Medial Geniculate Body J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2002; 88(1): 172 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. L. Golding, M. J. Ferragamo, and D. Oertel Role of Intrinsic Conductances Underlying Responses to Transients in Octopus Cells of the Cochlear Nucleus J. Neurosci., April 15, 1999; 19(8): 2897 - 2905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Heil and D. R. F. Irvine Functional Specialization in Auditory Cortex: Responses to Frequency-Modulated Stimuli in the Cat's Posterior Auditory Field J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1998; 79(6): 3041 - 3059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |