JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 39: 301-310, 1976;
0022-3077/76 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, V. J.
Right arrow Articles by Shimazu, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, V. J.
Right arrow Articles by Shimazu, H.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 39, Issue 2 301-310, Copyright © 1976 by APS


ARTICLES

Mossy fiber neck and second-order labyrinthine projections to cat flocculus

V. J. Wilson, M. Maeda, J. I. Franck and H. Shimazu

In five decerebrate cats and in two under N2O-O2 anesthesia, a bipolar electrode array was inserted into a granular layer in the rostral flocculus. At this location MF field potentials were evoked by stimulation of the ipsilateral vestibular nerve and of the C2 dorsal root ganglion. Stimulation through the array was used to fire brain stem neurons antidromically. The activity of these neurons was recorded extracellularly with glass microelectrodes. Stimulation of the C2 dorsal root ganglion evoked in the caudal lateral brain stem a field potential caused by the arrival of impulses in primary afferent fibers. Cells projecting to the flocculus also responded to the stimulus, usually monosynaptically. These neurons were fired by stimulation of the area of the atlantoaxial joint. They did not respond to stimulation of the contralateral C2 dorsal root ganglion, and responded only rarely to stimulation of the dorsal rami of the C2 and C3 spinal nerves. Stimulation of the vestibular nerve was ineffective. Another group of cells projecting to the flocculus was fired at short latency by stimulation of the ipsilateral vestibular nerve. These neurons were usually inhibited by stimulation of the contralateral vestibular nerve. They were not affected by stimulation of any neck afferents. The location of many recording locations was identified by means of fast green dye marks. Most neurons relaying neck activity were in group x of Brodal and Pompeiano (4), a few were in the external cuneate nucleus, and one was in the descending vestibular nucleus. Neurons relaying labyrinthine activity were in the descending vestibular nucleus; one was found in the medial nucleus, in which tracks were made only rarely. There are two parallel pathways relaying neck and labyrinthine activity to the flocculus. While they are separate at the level of the brain stem, they converge in the same rostral areas of the flocculus. The neck afferent information may be required for proper performance of the flocculus in eye-movement control.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Belton and R. A. McCrea
Role of the Cerebellar Flocculus Region in the Coordination of Eye and Head Movements During Gaze Pursuit
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2000; 84(3): 1614 - 1626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online