Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 39, Issue 5 925-935, Copyright © 1976 by APS

ARTICLES

Regulatory actions of human stretch reflex

P. E. Crago, J. C. Houk and Z. Hasan

1. The stretch reflex in the elbow flexor musculature was studied in 23 human subjects. The subjects were required to establish an initial force equivalent to 10% maximum at a prescribed initial length; mechanical disturbances delivered at random times increased load force to 15% or reduced it to 5%. We measured arm force, displacement, and EMG (usually biceps); acceleration was calculated from displacement, and average responses from sets of 10 like trials. 2. Modification of the stretch reflex was studied by comparing average responses obtained with different instructions, but with the same disturbance. The usual introductions were "compensate for arm deflection" and "do not intervene voluntarily". The initial response did not depend on instruction; changes in response that depended on instruction began abruptly after a latent period which ranged from 70 to 320 ms (measured from force and acceleration), depending on conditions and subject. The latency became longer (10-50 ms) and more variable when the subject did not know the direction of disturbance in advance. This and other observations indicate that modifications of the stretch reflex are not produced by servo actions. They are produced by triggered reactions, which occur at both short and long latencies and which have properties resembling the movements produced in a reaction-time task. 3. We confirmed that most subjects can suppress triggered reactions when the instruction calls for no intervention, leaving an unmodified reflex response. This response consists of a compliant deflection of the arm in the direction of the disturbance. 4. The compensatory actions associated with unmodified stretch (and unloading) reflexes were assessed from EMG responses of biceps. During a 300-ms transient phase, EMG changes were notably asymmetric when responses to symmetric disturbances were compared. Increased force stretched biceps and produced a prominent increase in EMG, whereas decreased force allowed biceps to shorten and produced either an EMG decrease of smaller magnitude or an actual increase. These asymmetric reflex actions produced quite symmetric mechanical responses (arm displacements and forces), which implies the existence of and compensation for nonlinear muscle mechanical properties. This result is discussed in relation to the hypothesis that the function of the stretch reflex is to compensate for variations in muscle properties, thus maintaining stiffness. 5. Effective control of muscle length or joint position does not result from servo action by the stretch reflex. Errors in position are corrected only when triggered reactions are superimposed on the reflex response.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. Pruszynski, I. Kurtzer, and S. H. Scott Rapid Motor Responses Are Appropriately Tuned to the Metrics of a Visuospatial Task J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 224 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Lewek, T. G. Hornby, Y. Y. Dhaher, and B. D. Schmit Prolonged Quadriceps Activity Following Imposed Hip Extension: A Neurophysiological Mechanism for Stiff-Knee Gait? J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3153 - 3162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. MacKinnon, D. Bissig, J. Chiusano, E. Miller, L. Rudnick, C. Jager, Y. Zhang, M.-L. Mille, and M. W. Rogers Preparation of Anticipatory Postural Adjustments Prior to Stepping J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 4368 - 4379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Milner and D. W. Franklin Impedance control and internal model use during the initial stage of adaptation to novel dynamics in humans J. Physiol., September 1, 2005; 567(2): 651 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C Fitzpatrick and S. C Gandevia Paradoxical muscle contractions and the neural control of movement and balance J. Physiol., April 1, 2005; 564(1): 2 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Li, D. G. Kamper, J. A. Stevens, and W. Z. Rymer The Effect of Motor Imagery on Spinal Segmental Excitability J. Neurosci., October 27, 2004; 24(43): 9674 - 9680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Myers, Y.-Y. Ju, J.-H. Hwang, P. J. McMahon, M. W. Rodosky, and S. M. Lephart Reflexive Muscle Activation Alterations in Shoulders With Anterior Glenohumeral Instability Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2004; 32(4): 1013 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. B. Shapiro, G. L. Gottlieb, and D. M. Corcos EMG Responses to an Unexpected Load in Fast Movements Are Delayed With an Increase in the Expected Movement Time J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2004; 91(5): 2135 - 2147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Fagergren, O. Ekeberg, and H. Forssberg Control Strategies Correcting Inaccurately Programmed Fingertip Forces: Model Predictions Derived From Human Behavior J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 2904 - 2916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Rodriguez-Fornells, A. R. Kurzbuch, and T. F. Munte Time Course of Error Detection and Correction in Humans: Neurophysiological Evidence J. Neurosci., November 15, 2002; 22(22): 9990 - 9996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. C. Lin and W. Z. Rymer Damping Actions of the Neuromuscular System With Inertial Loads: Human Flexor Pollicis Longus Muscle J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2001; 85(3): 1059 - 1066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. C. Popescu and W. Z. Rymer End Points of Planar Reaching Movements Are Disrupted by Small Force Pulses: An Evaluation of the Hypothesis of Equifinality J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2000; 84(5): 2670 - 2679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Prochazka, D. Gillard, and D. J. Bennett Implications of Positive Feedback in the Control of Movement J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1997; 77(6): 3237 - 3251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. V. Adamovich, M. F. Levin, and A. G. Feldman Central Modifications of Reflex Parameters May Underlie the Fastest Arm Movements J Neurophysiol, March 1, 1997; 77(3): 1460 - 1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T.A. McMahon Mechanics of Locomotion The International Journal of Robotics Research, June 1, 1984; 3(2): 4 - 28. [Abstract] [PDF]