Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 39, Issue 6 1288-1319, Copyright © 1976 by APS

ARTICLES

Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. I. Spatiotemporal organization of receptive fields

P. H. Schiller, B. L. Finlay and S. F. Volman

1. The properties of single cells in striate cortex of the rhesus monkey, representing the visual field 2 degrees -5 degrees from the fovea, were examined quantitatively with stationary and moving stimuli. Three distinct classes of cells were identified: S type, CX type, and T type. 2. S-type cells were defined as those oriented cells which to the optimal direction of movement in their receptive fields exhibited one or more spatially separate subfields within each of which a response was obtained to either a light or dark edge, but not to both. Several different types of S-cells were distinguished: a) S1-type cells for which moving edges revealed a single excitatory area within which a response was elicited by either a light or a dark edge but not by both. Most of these cells were unidirectional. b) S2-type cells for which moving edges revealed two spatially separate response areas, one of which was excited by a light edge and the other by a dark edge. Both regions responded to the same direction of movement. c) S3-type cells which had two response areas, one of which was excited by a stimulus moving in one direction (at right angles to the axis of orientation) and the other, of opposite contrast, which responded in the opposite direction, d) S4-type cells which to one direction of movement showed two spatially separate regions sensitive to a light and dark edge and which in the other direction of movement had only one responsive area (either light or dark). e) Cells which had multiple spatially separate subfields (S5-7 types). 3. CX-type cells were defined as those oriented cells which in their receptive fields exhibited no spatial separation for light- and dark-edge responses; they discharged to both edges in the same direction of movement and in the same spatial area. Flashing stimuli elicited both on and off responses throughout the receptive field. CX-type cells were predominantly of two types: those which were selective for direction of stimulus movement and those which were not. 4. A third class of cells (T-type) were those which were excited by only one sign of contrast change and responded in a sustained fashion even when there was no contour within the receptive field. These cells were poorly or not at all oriented; some of them were selective to wavelength. 5. Quantitative comparisons showed the following differences between S-type and CX-type cells: a) S-type cells had smaller receptive fields than CX-type cells but the populations over-lapped considerably. Receptive-field size was smallest in layer 4c. In all other layers S-type cells had the same size fields. CX-type cells, by contrast, tended to have larger fields in layer 5-6 than 2-3. b) The spatial separation between light and dark response areas was the best criterion for distinguishing S-type and CX-type cells. The distribution of this measure disclosed two populations of cells with relatively limited overlap. c) In layers 2 and 3, both S-type and CX-type cells had low spontaneous activity...

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. G. Nowak, M. V. Sanchez-Vives, and D. A. McCormick Lack of Orientation and Direction Selectivity in a Subgroup of Fast-Spiking Inhibitory Interneurons: Cellular and Synaptic Mechanisms and Comparison with Other Electrophysiological Cell Types Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2008; 18(5): 1058 - 1078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. A. Orban Higher Order Visual Processing in Macaque Extrastriate Cortex Physiol Rev, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 59 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Wielaard and P. Sajda Dependence of Response Properties on Sparse Connectivity in a Spiking Neuron Model of the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3292 - 3308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. D. Van Hooser Similarity and Diversity in Visual Cortex: Is There a Unifying Theory of Cortical Computation? Neuroscientist, December 1, 2007; 13(6): 639 - 656. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. J. Tehovnik and W. M. Slocum What Delay Fields Tell Us About Striate Cortex J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 559 - 576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. E. Williams and R. M. Shapley A Dynamic Nonlinearity and Spatial Phase Specificity in Macaque V1 Neurons J. Neurosci., May 23, 2007; 27(21): 5706 - 5718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Serre, A. Oliva, and T. Poggio A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization PNAS, April 10, 2007; 104(15): 6424 - 6429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Wielaard and P. Sajda Extraclassical Receptive Field Phenomena and Short-Range Connectivity in V1 Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2006; 16(11): 1531 - 1545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. R. Conway and M. S. Livingstone Spatial and temporal properties of cone signals in alert macaque primary visual cortex. J. Neurosci., October 18, 2006; 26(42): 10826 - 10846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Berkes and L. Wiskott On the Analysis and Interpretation of Inhomogeneous Quadratic Forms as Receptive Fields Neural Comput., August 1, 2006; 18(8): 1868 - 1895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. D. Van Hooser, J. A. Heimel, S. Chung, and S. B. Nelson Lack of patchy horizontal connectivity in primary visual cortex of a mammal without orientation maps. J. Neurosci., July 19, 2006; 26(29): 7680 - 7692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Tutunculer, G. Foffani, B. T. Himes, and K. A. Moxon Structure of the Excitatory Receptive Fields of Infragranular Forelimb Neurons in the Rat Primary Somatosensory Cortex Responding To Touch Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2006; 16(6): 791 - 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. McAdams and R. C. Reid Attention Modulates the Responses of Simple Cells in Monkey Primary Visual Cortex J. Neurosci., November 23, 2005; 25(47): 11023 - 11033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Heimel, S. D. Van Hooser, and S. B. Nelson Laminar Organization of Response Properties in Primary Visual Cortex of the Gray Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 3538 - 3554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. A. Read and B. G. Cumming Effect of Interocular Delay on Disparity-Selective V1 Neurons: Relationship to Stereoacuity and the Pulfrich Effect J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2005; 94(2): 1541 - 1553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Gur, I. Kagan, and D. M. Snodderly Orientation and Direction Selectivity of Neurons in V1 of Alert Monkeys: Functional Relationships and Laminar Distributions Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2005; 15(8): 1207 - 1221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Heider, G. Jando, and R. M. Siegel Functional Architecture of Retinotopy in Visual Association Cortex of Behaving Monkey Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2005; 15(4): 460 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Mata and D. L. Ringach Spatial Overlap of ON and OFF Subregions and Its Relation to Response Modulation Ratio in Macaque Primary Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2005; 93(2): 919 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. J. Tehovnik, W. M. Slocum, C. E. Carvey, and P. H. Schiller Phosphene Induction and the Generation of Saccadic Eye Movements by Striate Cortex J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2005; 93(1): 1 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Chen and N. Qian A Coarse-to-Fine Disparity Energy Model with Both Phase-Shift and Position-Shift Receptive Field Mechanisms Neural Comput., August 1, 2004; 16(8): 1545 - 1577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Peterson, B. Li, and R. D. Freeman The Derivation of Direction Selectivity in the Striate Cortex J. Neurosci., April 7, 2004; 24(14): 3583 - 3591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Martinez and J.-M. Alonso Complex Receptive Fields in Primary Visual Cortex Neuroscientist, October 1, 2003; 9(5): 317 - 331. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. R. Conway and M. S. Livingstone Space-Time Maps and Two-Bar Interactions of Different Classes of Direction-Selective Cells in Macaque V-1 J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2003; 89(5): 2726 - 2742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Livingstone and B. R. Conway Substructure of Direction-Selective Receptive Fields in Macaque V1 J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2003; 89(5): 2743 - 2759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. G. Nowak, R. Azouz, M. V. Sanchez-Vives, C. M. Gray, and D. A. McCormick Electrophysiological Classes of Cat Primary Visual Cortical Neurons In Vivo as Revealed by Quantitative Analyses J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2003; 89(3): 1541 - 1566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Grossberg How does the cerebral cortex work? development, learning, attention, and 3-D vision by laminar circuits of visual cortex. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, March 1, 2003; 2(1): 47 - 76. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Kagan, M. Gur, and D. M. Snodderly Spatial Organization of Receptive Fields of V1 Neurons of Alert Monkeys: Comparison With Responses to Gratings J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2002; 88(5): 2557 - 2574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. G. Solomon, A. J. R. White, and P. R. Martin Extraclassical Receptive Field Properties of Parvocellular, Magnocellular, and Koniocellular Cells in the Primate Lateral Geniculate Nucleus J. Neurosci., January 1, 2002; 22(1): 338 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Chen, Y. Wang, and N. Qian Modeling V1 Disparity Tuning to Time-Varying Stimuli J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2001; 86(1): 143 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. C. Sincich and G. G. Blasdel Oriented Axon Projections in Primary Visual Cortex of the Monkey J. Neurosci., June 15, 2001; 21(12): 4416 - 4426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P. Sceniak, M. J. Hawken, and R. Shapley Visual Spatial Characterization of Macaque V1 Neurons J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2001; 85(5): 1873 - 1887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Zhou, H. S. Friedman, and R. von der Heydt Coding of Border Ownership in Monkey Visual Cortex J. Neurosci., September 1, 2000; 20(17): 6594 - 6611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Carandini and D. Ferster Membrane Potential and Firing Rate in Cat Primary Visual Cortex J. Neurosci., January 1, 2000; 20(1): 470 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Amit and D. Geman A Computational Model for Visual Selection Neural Comput., October 1, 1999; 11(7): 1691 - 1715. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. Anzai, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman Neural Mechanisms for Encoding Binocular Disparity: Receptive Field Position Versus Phase J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 874 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. A.F. Lamme, V. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, and H. Spekreijse Separate Processing Dynamics for Texture Elements, Boundaries and Surfaces in Primary Visual Cortex of the Macaque Monkey Cereb Cortex, June 1, 1999; 9(4): 406 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. P. O'Keefe, J. B. Levitt, D. C. Kiper, R. M. Shapley, and J. A. Movshon Functional Organization of Owl Monkey Lateral Geniculate Nucleus and Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1998; 80(2): 594 - 609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. A. F. Lamme, K. Zipser, and H. Spekreijse Figure-ground activity in primary visual cortex is suppressed by anesthesia PNAS, March 17, 1998; 95(6): 3263 - 3268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Albright Form-cue invariant motion processing in primate visual cortex Science, February 28, 1992; 255(5048): 1141 - 1143. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M Shadlen and T Carney Mechanisms of human motion perception revealed by a new cyclopean illusion Science, April 4, 1986; 232(4746): 95 - 97. [Abstract] [PDF]