JN Add DOIs to your references at manuscript stage!
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 40: 9-15, 1977;
0022-3077/77 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Vastola, E. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Vastola, E. F.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 40, Issue 1 9-15, Copyright © 1977 by APS


ARTICLES

Antidromic activity in visual radiation during evoked cortical responses

A. D. Rosen and E. F. Vastola

1. Antidromic stimulation of the visual radiation of cats has been used to investigate the possibility that some of the activity in principal geniculate cells following an optic tract stimulus is antidromic. Single spikes were selected from two classes of poststimulus activity to condition the antidromic test spike--the undoubted orthodromic postsynaptic spike and the later spikes, occurring up to 100 ms after the optic tract stimulus. 2. In 15 of 39 cells the minimum antidromic activation times and the minimum spike-spike intervals were found to be shorter and latencies for antidromic stimulation were longer when the conditioning spikes belonged the class of late poststimulus activity. The differences are in accord with the assumption that some of the conditioning spikes were antidromic. 3. Test spikes were frequently found to have long and variable latency when the conditioning spike occurred more than 45 ms after the optic tract stimulus. Possible reasons are briefly discussed. 4. It is suggested that antidromic activity may occur in conditions of the cortex that are more physiological than those associated with a penicillin-induced seizure focus. Some possible mechanisms and functional significance are briefly discussed.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online