JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 41: 484-495, 1978;
0022-3077/78 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Glickstein, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Glickstein, M.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 41, Issue 2 484-495, Copyright © 1978 by APS


ARTICLES

Corticopontine cells in area 18 of the cat

A. Gibson, J. Baker, G. Mower and M. Glickstein

1. Area 18 projects to the rostral pontine nuclei. The visual response properties of rostral pontine cells differ greatly from those that have been reported for area 18 cells. We identified and studied corticopontine cells in area 18 and compared their receptive-field properties to those of other area 18 cells and to pontine visual cells. 2. We first located the visual area in the rostral pons by microelectrode recording and placed stimulating electrodes at the same site. Anti-dromically invaded cells were then recorded in area 18. The antidromic invasion of each cell was verified by orthodromic-antidromic spike collision. 3. Fifty-seven well-isolated corticopontine cells were studied in detail. We also recorded 466 unitary antidromic potentials with a mean invasion latency of 3.5 ms and recorded from 40 additional area 18 units to serve as a comparison group for the corticopontine cells. The comparison group cells were located in the same area in the visual field as the corticopontine cells. 4. The average receptive-field area for corticopontine cells (485 deg2) was much larger than the comparison cells (59 deg2). Forty percent of the corticopontine cells responded preferentially to multiple-spot target. Properly oriented gratings, slits, or edges were the most effective stimuli for the comparison cells. Eighty-two percent of the corticopontine cells showed clear directional preferences to moving-spot stimuli, and downward movements were most commonly preferred. Fifty-five percent of the area 18 comparison cells showed some directional preference, but no particular direction was preferred. The optimal stimulus speeds for corticopontine cells were higher than those for the comparison cells. 5. The response properties of the area 18 corticopontine cells are similar to the response properties of rostral pontine visual cells, except for a somewhat higher selectivity for orientation in the corticopontine cells. 6. We conclude that most response properties of rostral pontine visual cells are already present in a subset of area 18 cortical cells which project to the pons. The corticopontine cells are sensitive to multiple-spot targets moving in particular directions over large portions of the visual field, such properties are consistent with a visuomotor function for the corticopontocerebellar pathway.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online