JN AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 41: 692-704, 1978;
0022-3077/78 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rhode, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, D. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rhode, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kennedy, D. T.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 41, Issue 3 692-704, Copyright © 1978 by APS

ARTICLES

Auditory nerve fiber response to wide-band noise and tone combinations

W. S. Rhode, C. D. Geisler and D. T. Kennedy

1. Responses of single auditory nerve fibers to combinations of noise and tone were obtained. The results were found to depend on the relative effectiveness of each stimulus when presented alone. 2. When the response rate to one stimulus presented alone was considerably greater than the response rate to the other stimulus presented alone, the more effective stimulus dominated the responses when the two stimuli were combined. The more effective stimulus captured the response of the neuron. Thus, intense noise was found to mask responses to weaker tones, and intense tones were found to mask responses to weaker noise. This masking of the weaker stimulus is thought to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio of the most prominent response component. 3. When the two stimuli had similar effectiveness, complex interactions occurred. When the tone was near best (characteristic) frequency, partial summation effects occured. The tone partially suppressed the responses to the noise if other frequencies were used. Tones above best frequency caused particularly powerful suppression. 4. The bandwidth of the noise was varied somewhat. While bandwidth affected the effectiveness of the noise, it did not affect the types of interactions observed. 5. For a neuron which was essentially silent in the absence of acoustic stimuli, adding a weak level of noise lowered the threshold of responsiveness to the tone.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Siveke, C. Leibold, and B. Grothe
Spectral Composition of Concurrent Noise Affects Neuronal Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences of Tones in the Dorsal Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 2705 - 2715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Gai and L. H. Carney
Temporal Measures and Neural Strategies for Detection of Tones in Noise Based on Responses in Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2451 - 2464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Zhang, K. T. Nakamoto, and L. M. Kitzes
Modulation of Level Response Areas and Stimulus Selectivity of Neurons in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2263 - 2274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online