Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 41, Issue 4 870-884, Copyright © 1978 by APS

ARTICLES

Space and frequency are represented separately in auditory midbrain of the owl

E. I. Knudsen and M. Konishi

1. The influence of sound location and sound frequency on the responses of single units in the midbrain auditory area (MLD) of the owl (Tyto alba) were studied using a movable sound source under free-field conditions. With this technique, two functionally distinct regions in MLD have been identified: a tonotopic region and a space-mapped region. 2. MLD units were classified according to their receptive-field properties: 1) limited-field units responded only to sound from a small, discrete area of space; 2) complex-field units exhibited two to four different excitatory areas separated by areas of reduced response or inhibition: 3) space-preferring units responded best to a certain area of space, but their fields expanded considerably with increasing sound intensities; 4) Space-independent units responded similarly to a sound stimulus regardless of its location in space. 3. Limited-field units were located exclusively along the lateral and anterior borders of MLD. These units were tuned to sound frequencies at the high end of the owl's audible range (5-8.7 kHz). They usually responded only at the onset of a tonal stimulus; but most importantly, the units were systematically arranged in this region according to the azimuths and elevations of their receptive fields, thus creating a physiological map of auditory space. Because of this latter, dominant aspect of its functional organization, this region is named the space-mapped region of MLD. 4. The receptive fields of units in the larger, medial portion of MLD were of the space-independent, space-preferring, or complex-field types. These units tended to respond in a sustained fashion to tone and noise bursts, and these units were arranged in a strict frequency-dependent order. Based on this last property, this region is named the tonotopic region of MLD. 5. Because of the salient differences in the response properties of their constituent units, it is argued that the space-mapped region and the tonotopic region are involved in different aspects of sound analysis.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. J. Fischer, J. L. Pena, and M. Konishi Emergence of Multiplicative Auditory Responses in the Midbrain of the Barn Owl J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1181 - 1193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Wagner, A. Asadollahi, P. Bremen, F. Endler, K. Vonderschen, and M. von Campenhausen Distribution of Interaural Time Difference in the Barn Owl's Inferior Colliculus in the Low- and High-Frequency Ranges J. Neurosci., April 11, 2007; 27(15): 4191 - 4200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Gutfreund and E. I. Knudsen Adaptation in the Auditory Space Map of the Barn Owl J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 813 - 825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. H. Keller and T. T. Takahashi Localization and Identification of Concurrent Sounds in the Owl's Auditory Space Map J. Neurosci., November 9, 2005; 25(45): 10446 - 10461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Behrend, B. Dickson, E. Clarke, C. Jin, and S. Carlile Neural Responses to Free Field and Virtual Acoustic Stimulation in the Inferior Colliculus of the Guinea Pig J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2004; 92(5): 3014 - 3029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. W. Spitzer, A. D. S. Bala, and T. T. Takahashi A Neuronal Correlate of the Precedence Effect Is Associated With Spatial Selectivity in the Barn Owl's Auditory Midbrain J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2004; 92(4): 2051 - 2070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Coleman and R. Mooney Synaptic Transformations Underlying Highly Selective Auditory Representations of Learned Birdsong J. Neurosci., August 18, 2004; 24(33): 7251 - 7265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. N. Woolley and J. H. Casseday Response Properties of Single Neurons in the Zebra Finch Auditory Midbrain: Response Patterns, Frequency Coding, Intensity Coding, and Spike Latencies J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 136 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. J. Sterbing, K. Hartung, and K.-P. Hoffmann Spatial Tuning to Virtual Sounds in the Inferior Colliculus of the Guinea Pig J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2003; 90(4): 2648 - 2659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Spezio and T. T. Takahashi Frequency-Specific Interaural Level Difference Tuning Predicts Spatial Response Patterns of Space-Specific Neurons in the Barn Owl Inferior Colliculus J. Neurosci., June 1, 2003; 23(11): 4677 - 4688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. R. Euston and T. T. Takahashi From Spectrum to Space: The Contribution of Level Difference Cues to Spatial Receptive Fields in the Barn Owl Inferior Colliculus J. Neurosci., January 1, 2002; 22(1): 284 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. I. Gold and E. I. Knudsen Adaptive Adjustment of Connectivity in the Inferior Colliculus Revealed by Focal Pharmacological Inactivation J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2001; 85(4): 1575 - 1584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. H. Keller and T. T. Takahashi Representation of Temporal Features of Complex Sounds by the Discharge Patterns of Neurons in the Owl's Inferior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2000; 84(5): 2638 - 2650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Pena and M. Konishi Cellular mechanisms for resolving phase ambiguity in the owl's inferior colliculus PNAS, October 24, 2000; 97(22): 11787 - 11792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. H. Recanzone, D. C. Guard, M. L. Phan, and T.-I K. Su Correlation Between the Activity of Single Auditory Cortical Neurons and Sound-Localization Behavior in the Macaque Monkey J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 2723 - 2739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. I. Gold and E. I. Knudsen A Site of Auditory Experience-Dependent Plasticity in the Neural Representation of Auditory Space in the Barn Owl's Inferior Colliculus J. Neurosci., May 1, 2000; 20(9): 3469 - 3486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Kautz and H. Wagner GABAergic Inhibition Influences Auditory Motion-Direction Sensitivity in Barn Owls J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1998; 80(1): 172 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. H. Schnupp and A. J. King Coding for Auditory Space in the Nucleus of the Brachium of the Inferior Colliculus in the Ferret J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1997; 78(5): 2717 - 2731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Proctor and M. Konishi Representation of sound localization cues in the auditory thalamus of the barn owl PNAS, September 16, 1997; 94(19): 10421 - 10425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Lewicki and B. J. Arthur Hierarchical Organization of Auditory Temporal Context Sensitivity J. Neurosci., November 1, 1996; 16(21): 6987 - 6998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Knudsen and M Konishi Center-surround organization of auditory receptive fields in the owl Science, November 17, 1978; 202(4369): 778 - 780. [Abstract] [PDF]