JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 42: 274-291, 1979;
0022-3077/79 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bullier, J.
Right arrow Articles by Norton, T. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bullier, J.
Right arrow Articles by Norton, T. T.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 42, Issue 1 274-291, Copyright © 1979 by APS


ARTICLES

Comparison of receptive-field properties of X and Y ganglion cells with X and Y lateral geniculate cells in the cat

J. Bullier and T. T. Norton

1. To examine the transmission of visual information through the lateral geniculate nucleus, we have studied the receptive-field properties of 65 X and Y optic tract axons and compared them with the receptive-field properties of X and Y LGN cells in paralyzed cats anesthetized with N2O/O2 (70/30%). The same experimental conditions and quantitative methods have been used as in the preceding study of LGN cells (2). 2. The spatiotemporal organization of the receptive fields of X and Y retinal axons are similar to those of X and Y LGN cells. X ganglion cell receptive fields show a simple center-surround organization, whereas Y ganglion cell receptive fields show a more complex organization with three concentric regions: a central region of center-type response, a region of mixed center-type and surround-type responses, and a region of surround-type response. 3. The inhibitory strengh of the surrounding region was tested with a centrally located flashing light spot of successively increased diameter. As in the LGN, the inhibitory strenght of the surrounding region was stronger in retinal X-cells than in retinal Y-cells, and the strength of the inhibition decreased as the diameter of the receptive-field center increased. 4. The decrease of the inhibitory strength of the surrounding region with increasing distance from the receptive-field center was similar in the retina and in the LGN for cells belonging to the same class (X or Y) and having the same receptive-field center size. 5. The differences in properties in the LGN between small-field X-, large-field X-, and Y-cells are best explained by assuming that they are driven, respectively, by small-field X, large-field X, and Y retinal ganglion cells. There does not appear to be a significant mixing of properties either between cells having different receptive-field center sizes. 6. The principal transformation we found between retinal and LGN units is that X LGN cells have sharply lower spontaneous activities and driven activities, as compared with X ganglion cells. Y LGN units show only a small decrease in spontaneous activity in comparison with Y ganglion cells. 7. We conclude that there is a significant alteration in the LGN only in the properties of X-cells, possibly by way of a strong inhibitory pool converging on X LGN units. We further suggest that this inhibitory pool plays a role in the modulation of transmission of information through the LGN only in the X channel, while the Y channel appears to be relatively unaffected.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
E. A. Allen and R. D. Freeman
Dynamic spatial processing originates in early visual pathways.
J. Neurosci., November 8, 2006; 26(45): 11763 - 11774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
H. Nakagama and S. Tanaka
Self-organization Model of Cytochrome Oxidase Blobs and Ocular Dominance Columns in the Primary Visual Cortex
Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2004; 14(4): 376 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. D. Van Hooser, J. A. F. Heimel, and S. B. Nelson
Receptive Field Properties and Laminar Organization of Lateral Geniculate Nucleus in the Gray Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis)
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 3398 - 3418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. A. Hirsch
Synaptic Physiology and Receptive Field Structure in the Early Visual Pathway of the Cat
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2003; 13(1): 63 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. Gutierrez, C. L. Cox, J. Rinzel, and S. M. Sherman
Dynamics of Low-Threshold Spike Activation in Relay Neurons of the Cat Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
J. Neurosci., February 1, 2001; 21(3): 1022 - 1032.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online