JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 42: 1680-1691, 1979;
0022-3077/79 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ono, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nakajima, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ono, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nakajima, S.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 42, Issue 6 1680-1691, Copyright © 1979 by APS


ARTICLES

Effects of temperature and deuterium oxide on crustacean stretch receptor

T. Ono and S. Nakajima

1. The receptor potential was recorded intracellularly from the isolated stretch receptor neuron of crayfish. Total substitution of D2O for H2O in the bathing solution reversibly decreased the amplitude of the receptor potential to a level of 34% of the control. The input resistance of the neuron was slightly increased by the D2O treatment, while the resting potential and the input capacity were virtually unchanged. The viscoelastic property of the receptor muscle was not altered by the D2O substitution. Thus, D2O seems to inhibit directly the activation process of the receptor potential. 2. Temperature change over the range of 25-5 degrees C did not affect the amplitude of receptor potential. However, the input resistance of the neuron was increased about twofold by the lowering of temperature from 25 to 5 degrees C. 3. We conclude that when the temperature is lowered, the receptor current is diminished, but this decline is just about compensated for by the increase in membrane resistance, resulting in a near constancy of the receptor potential. This is the cellular basis for the relative constancy of the transduction process of the stretch receptor in the face of large temperature changes. On the other hand, in the case of D2O substitution the compensation mechanism of the resistance increase does not work, and the sensory transduction is inhibited substantially.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online