Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 43, Issue 3 612-620, Copyright © 1980 by APS

ARTICLES

Rapid ankle extension during paw shakes: selective recruitment of fast ankle extensors

J. L. Smith, B. Betts, V. R. Edgerton and R. F. Zernicke

1. Electromyographic (EMG) signals from slow (soleus) and fast (lateral gastrocnemius) ankle extensors of six cats were recorded during rapid and alternate flexion-extension of the hindlimb elicited by placing the paw in water or by sticking tape to the plantar pads. High-speed 16-mm film, taken at 100 or 200 frames/s, was analyzed to determine the knee and ankle joint kinematics. 2. During 77 typical records, which averaged eight paw shakes each, a single extension-flexion cycle measured by the paw shake interval (PSI) of the electromyogram record, averaged 88 ms and ranged from 55 to 110 ms. LG EMG bursts of 10 ms in duration were synchronized with the peak displacement of ankle flexion. The SOL was inactive throughout these typical records. 3. During four atypical records from one cat, the average OSI was 141 ms, and both lateral gastrocnemius (LG and soleus (SOL) were active simultaneously. At a range of 6--8 cycles/s, these slower shakes are comparable to rhythmic actions of scratching )12) and locomotion (27); cyclic movements that typically include the recruitment of soleus. 4. It is suggested that paw shaking is an automatic movement triggered primarily by large, low-threshold afferents innervating the central plantar pads, which may selectively recruit the fast extensors while inhibiting the slow extensor. This is the only movement of the hindlimb recorded to date in our laboratory in which the tlg was active without the SOL. This unique dissociation of recruitment of slow and fast ankle extensors may be dictated by the time constraints imposed by the rapid cyclic movements of paw shaking.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Maas and T. G. Sandercock Are skeletal muscles independent actuators? Force transmission from soleus muscle in the cat J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2008; 104(6): 1557 - 1567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. F. Hodson-Tole and J. M. Wakeling Variations in motor unit recruitment patterns occur within and between muscles in the running rat (Rattus norvegicus) J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 210(13): 2333 - 2345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Wakeling Motor units are recruited in a task-dependent fashion during locomotion J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2004; 207(22): 3883 - 3890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Chau, N. Giroux, H. Barbeau, L. Jordan, and S. Rossignol Effects of Intrathecal Glutamatergic Drugs on Locomotion I. NMDA in Short-Term Spinal Cats J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2002; 88(6): 3032 - 3045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Wakeling, M. Kaya, G. K. Temple, I. A. Johnston, and W. Herzog Determining patterns of motor recruitment during locomotion J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2002; 205(3): 359 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. E. Loeb Asymmetry of Hindlimb Muscle Activity and Cutaneous Reflexes After Tendon Transfers in Kittens J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1999; 82(6): 3392 - 3405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Tamaki, K. Kitada, T. Akamine, F. Murata, T. Sakou, and H. Kurata Alternate activity in the synergistic muscles during prolonged low-level contractions J Appl Physiol, June 1, 1998; 84(6): 1943 - 1951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]