JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 43: 621-629, 1980;
0022-3077/80 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Binder, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Stuart, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Binder, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Stuart, D. G.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 43, Issue 3 621-629, Copyright © 1980 by APS

ARTICLES

Responses of Ia and spindle group II afferents to single motor-unit contractions

M. D. Binder and D. G. Stuart

1. The responses of deefferented Ia and spindle group II afferents to electrically activated twitch contractions of randomly selected motor units of the cat tibialis posterior muscle have been studied. Each afferent was paired with from 8 to 20 of the muscle's 60 motor units, and each afferent-motor unit interaction was recorded to two muscle lengths. 2. Cross-correlation histograms were compiled for each afferent-motor unit interaction studied as well as the average twitch tension produced by the motor unit. A numerical "coupling index" was computed for the histogram distributions to quantitate the extent of mechanical coupling between the receptor and the single motor units. 3. Qualitatively, no consistent differences were noted in the responses of Ia and spindle group II afferents to single motor-unit contractions. However, Ia afferents were responsive to a higher percentage of motor units with which they were tested (89%) and, on the average, displayed a significantly larger magnitude of response (mean coupling index, 0.72 +/- 0.04 SE) than the spindle group II afferents (66% of motor units; mean coupling index, 0.51 +/- 0.03). 4. The extent to which a motor-unit contraction altered the discharge pattern of a spindle afferent was not strictly related to the amount of force generated by the unit, nor to its contraction time. 5. Muscle length exerted a strong influence on both the qualitative and quantitative features of many of the motor unit-muscle receptor interactions. 6. These results suggest that the degree of "mechanical coupling" between a receptor and a motor unit is largely dependent on anatomical arrangements and reinforce the possibility that muscle receptors generate a "sensory partitioning" of the motor-unit population within a muscle.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. N. Christakos, N. A. Papadimitriou, and S. Erimaki
Parallel Neuronal Mechanisms Underlying Physiological Force Tremor in Steady Muscle Contractions of Humans
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 53 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online