JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 45: 397-416, 1981;
0022-3077/81 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Allman, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baker, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Allman, J. M.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 45, Issue 3 397-416, Copyright © 1981 by APS

ARTICLES

Visual response properties of neurons in four extrastriate visual areas of the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus): a quantitative comparison of medial, dorsomedial, dorsolateral, and middle temporal areas

J. F. Baker, S. E. Petersen, W. T. Newsome and J. M. Allman

1. The response properties of 354 single neurons in the medial (M), dorsomedial (DM), dorsolateral (DL), and middle temporal (MT) visual areas were studied quantitatively with bar, spot, and random-dot stimuli in chronically implanted owl monkeys with fixed gaze. 2. A directionality index was computed to compare the responses to stimuli in the optimal direction with the responses to the opposing direction of movement. The greater the difference between opposing directions, the higher the index. MT cells had much higher direction indices to moving bars than cells in DL, DM, and M. 3. A tuning index was computed for each cell to compare the responses to bars moving in the optimal direction, or flashed in the optimal orientation, with the responses in other directions or orientations within +/- 90 degrees. Cells in all four areas were more sharply tuned to the orientation of stationary flashed bars than to moving bars, although a few cells (9/92( were unresponsive in the absence of movement. DM cells tended to be more sharply tuned to moving bars than cells in the other areas. 4. Directionality in DM, DL, and MT was relatively unaffected by the use of single-spot stimuli instead of bars; tuning in all four areas was broader to spots than bars. 5. Moving arrays of randomly spaced spots were more strongly excitatory than bar stimuli for many neurons in MT (16/31 cells). These random-dot stimuli were also effective in M, but evoked no response or weak responses from most cells in DM and DL. 6. The best velocities of movement were usually in the range of 10-100 degrees/s, although a few cells (22/227), primarily in MT (14/69 cells), preferred higher velocities. 7. Receptive fields of neurons in all four areas were much larger than striate receptive fields. Eccentricity was positively correlated with receptive-field size (r = 0.62), but was not correlated with directionality index, tuning index, or best velocity. 8. The results support the hypothesis that there are specializations of function among the cortical visual areas.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cereb CortexHome page
A. S. Drew and P. van Donkelaar
The Contribution of the Human FEF and SEF to Smooth Pursuit Initiation
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2007; 17(11): 2618 - 2624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. M. Woods, S. E. Lopez, J. H. Long, J. E. Rahman, and G. H. Recanzone
Effects of Stimulus Azimuth and Intensity on the Single-Neuron Activity in the Auditory Cortex of the Alert Macaque Monkey
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 3323 - 3337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Zaksas and T. Pasternak
Directional Signals in the Prefrontal Cortex and in Area MT during a Working Memory for Visual Motion Task.
J. Neurosci., November 8, 2006; 26(45): 11726 - 11742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Pitzalis, C. Galletti, R.-S. Huang, F. Patria, G. Committeri, G. Galati, P. Fattori, and M. I. Sereno
Wide-field retinotopy defines human cortical visual area v6.
J. Neurosci., July 26, 2006; 26(30): 7962 - 7973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cereb CortexHome page
L. L. Lui, J. A. Bourne, and M. G.P. Rosa
Functional Response Properties of Neurons in the Dorsomedial Visual Area of New World Monkeys (Callithrix jacchus)
Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2006; 16(2): 162 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N.S.C. Price, M. R. Ibbotson, S. Ono, and M. J. Mustari
Rapid Processing of Retinal Slip During Saccades in Macaque Area MT
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 235 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Physiol.Home page
S. Zeki
Thirty years of a very special visual area, Area V5
J. Physiol., May 15, 2004; 557(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
X. Xu, C. E. Collins, P. M. Kaskan, I. Khaytin, J. H. Kaas, and V. A. Casagrande
Optical imaging of visually evoked responses in prosimian primates reveals conserved features of the middle temporal visual area
PNAS, February 24, 2004; 101(8): 2566 - 2571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
R. B. H. Tootell, D. Tsao, and W. Vanduffel
Neuroimaging Weighs In: Humans Meet Macaques in "Primate" Visual Cortex
J. Neurosci., May 15, 2003; 23(10): 3981 - 3989.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Missal and S. J. Heinen
Facilitation of Smooth Pursuit Initiation by Electrical Stimulation in the Supplementary Eye Fields
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2001; 86(5): 2413 - 2425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
G. A. Walker, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman
Asymmetric Suppression Outside the Classical Receptive Field of the Visual Cortex
J. Neurosci., December 1, 1999; 19(23): 10536 - 10553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. H. Recanzone and R. H. Wurtz
Shift in Smooth Pursuit Initiation and MT and MST Neuronal Activity Under Different Stimulus Conditions
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1999; 82(4): 1710 - 1727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. Seidemann and W. T. Newsome
Effect of Spatial Attention on the Responses of Area MT Neurons
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 1999; 81(4): 1783 - 1794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Tanaka and K. Fukushima
Neuronal Responses Related to Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements in the Periarcuate Cortical Area of Monkeys
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1998; 80(1): 28 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. W. Wilson and W. E. O'Neill
Auditory Motion Induces Directionally Dependent Receptive Field Shifts in Inferior Colliculus Neurons
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 1998; 79(4): 2040 - 2062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. H. Recanzone, R. H. Wurtz, and U. Schwarz
Responses of MT and MST Neurons to One and Two Moving Objects in the Receptive Field
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1997; 78(6): 2904 - 2915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Shmuel and A. Grinvald
Functional Organization for Direction of Motion and Its Relationship to Orientation Maps in Cat Area 18
J. Neurosci., November 1, 1996; 16(21): 6945 - 6964.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
C. Salzman and W. Newsome
Neural mechanisms for forming a perceptual decision
Science, April 8, 1994; 264(5156): 231 - 237.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online