JN Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 47: 151-166, 1982;
0022-3077/82 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Appenteng, K.
Right arrow Articles by Seguin, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Appenteng, K.
Right arrow Articles by Seguin, J. J.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 47, Issue 2 151-166, Copyright © 1982 by APS

ARTICLES

Behavior of cutaneous mechanoreceptors recorded in mandibular division of Gasserian ganglion of the rabbit during movements of lower jaw

K. Appenteng, J. P. Lund and J. J. Seguin

1. The activity of cutaneous mechanoreceptors was recorded extracellularly in the mandibular division of the Gasserian ganglion of hemidecerebrate anesthetized rabbits. Fifty-four hair follicle afferents and 80 skin mechanoreceptor afferents were functionally identified. Their receptive-field characteristics were described and their activity patterns were recorded while the jaw was displaced by hand in the vertical, horizontal, and anterior-posterior directions, and during masticatory movements. 2. All hair follicle afferents were classified as rapidly adapting, whereas skin afferents could be divided into two categories: rapidly adapting and slowly adapting. Rapidly and slowly adapting receptors were found in all regions of the mandibular skin. Only one hair follicle afferent and four skin afferents fired spontaneously with the jaw at rest. 3. Fifty-eight percent (29/50) of the hair follicle afferents were activated by imposed displacement of the jaw and all of these tested also discharged during chewing. They were sensitive to movement in all three axes and their firing frequency was linearly related to the velocity, regardless of direction. 4. Only 10% (8/80) of the skin afferents were activated by imposed displacement of the jaw if their receptive fields were not directly contacted. Firing frequency was not well related to either the amplitude or velocity of movement. During chewing, the discharge frequency was variable but, in general, firing was restricted to the jaw-closing phase. Most skin afferents that were active during jaw movement had receptive fields close to the corner of the mouth. 5. The results are discussed within the context of a possible involvement of cutaneous afferents in kinesthesia and in the control of jaw movements. Hair afferents could make specific contributions to the appreciation of movement because their discharge pattern was clearly related to one of its parameters. The lack of activity of most skin afferents, as well as the absence of a strong correlation between the firing frequency of those that were active and the movement parameters, suggest that they do not make specific contributions to the awareness of movement. 6. Hair and skin afferents may also make different contributions to the control of ongoing movements. It is suggested that skin afferent activity during jaw closure may elicit a reflex reduction in the velocity or duration of this phase. Some evidence from other studies suggests that hair afferent activity may indirectly influence movement via effects on elevator fusimotor neurons.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online