JN  AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 49: 383-395, 1983;
0022-3077/83 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Irvine, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Irvine, D. R.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 49, Issue 2 383-395, Copyright © 1983 by APS


ARTICLES

Some features of binaural input to single neurons in physiologically defined area AI of cat cerebral cortex

D. P. Phillips and D. R. Irvine

1. In the ectosylvian cortex of 24 barbiturate-anesthetized cats, area AI was identified by its frequency organization and the responses to tonal stimuli of single neurons in that field were examined using sealed stimulating systems incorporating calibrated probe microphone assemblies. 2. The responsiveness to monaural and binaural best-frequency stimuli was examined quantitatively for 282 single units in AI. One hundred thirty-nine cells (49%) were excited by independent stimulation of only one ear and were classified as EO cells. In general, the effective monaural excitatory input was derived from the contralateral ear. One hundred ten (39%) neurons were excited by independent stimulation of each ear and were classified as EE units. For these neurons, the contralateral responses were generally stronger, shorter in latency, and lower in threshold than were their ipsilateral responses. Thirty-three cells (12%) gave weak or no responses to monaural stimuli but responded securely to binaural stimuli. These cells were classified as predominantly binaural (PB). 3. Binaural interactions were examined by comparison of the response to binaural, equally intense stimuli to the stronger monaural response. Among EO cells suppression was the most common form of interaction, while for EE cells summation was the more common. Less than 8% of cells were found to be monaural. 4. In electrode penetrations radial to the cortex surface, cells received their stronger or sole monaural excitatory input from a common ear, generally the contralateral. Within such penetrations, however, cells commonly differed with regard to the nature of their input from the other ear and/or in their binaural interactions. 5. Comparison of these data with data previously reported for subcortical auditory nuclei revealed that AI preserves many of the stimulus specificity characteristics of the lower nuclei. The reasons for the preservation of these characteristics at the cortex and the implications of the present data for the binaural column hypothesis are discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. A. Campbell, J. W. H. Schnupp, A. Shial, and A. J. King
Binaural-Level Functions in Ferret Auditory Cortex: Evidence for a Continuous Distribution of Response Properties
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3742 - 3755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Zhang, K. T. Nakamoto, and L. M. Kitzes
Binaural Interaction Revisited in the Cat Primary Auditory Cortex
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 101 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. A. Reale, R. L. Jenison, and J. F. Brugge
Directional Sensitivity of Neurons in the Primary Auditory (AI) Cortex: Effects of Sound-Source Intensity Level
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2003; 89(2): 1024 - 1038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. F. Linden and C. E. Schreiner
Columnar Transformations in Auditory Cortex? A Comparison to Visual and Somatosensory Cortices
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2003; 13(1): 83 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
H. Ojima and K. Murakami
Intracellular Characterization of Suppressive Responses in Supragranular Pyramidal Neurons of Cat Primary Auditory Cortex In Vivo
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2002; 12(10): 1079 - 1091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. M. Miller, M. A. Escabi, H. L. Read, and C. E. Schreiner
Spectrotemporal Receptive Fields in the Lemniscal Auditory Thalamus and Cortex
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 516 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. W. Cheung, P. H. Bedenbaugh, S. S. Nagarajan, and C. E. Schreiner
Functional Organization of Squirrel Monkey Primary Auditory Cortex: Responses to Pure Tones
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2001; 85(4): 1732 - 1749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Kaiser, W. Lutzenberger, H. Preissl, H. Ackermann, and N. Birbaumer
Right-Hemisphere Dominance for the Processing of Sound-Source Lateralization
J. Neurosci., September 1, 2000; 20(17): 6631 - 6639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
D.H. Reser, Y.I. Fishman, J.C. Arezzo, and M. Steinschneider
Binaural Interactions in Primary Auditory Cortex of the Awake Macaque
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2000; 10(6): 574 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. R. Mendelson and K. L. Grasse
Auditory Cortical Responses to the Interactive Effects of Interaural Intensity Disparities and Frequency
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2000; 10(1): 32 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online