JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 49: 730-744, 1983;
0022-3077/83 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collins, W. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Collins, W. F., 3rd

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 49, Issue 3 730-744, Copyright © 1983 by APS


ARTICLES

Organization of electrical coupling between frog lumbar motoneurons

W. F. Collins 3rd

1. The organization of electrical coupling between lumbar motoneurons in the isolated frog spinal cord was investigated. Intracellular recordings were made from unidentified and identified thigh muscle motoneurons in segment 9. Excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) elicited by stimulation of individual muscle nerves with dorsal roots cut (VR-EPSPs) were observed when the cord was perfused with either normal frog Ringer solution or calcium-free Ringer solution containing 2, 2.5, or 5 mM magnesium. 2. The VR-EPSPs recorded following stimulation of the homonymous muscle nerve were greater in amplitude and occurred with a shorter latency than the VR-EPSPs observed following stimulation of muscle nerves to different muscles. In addition, the latter VR-EPSPs had a shorter half-decay time. 3. Electrical connections made by motoneurons innervating synergistic muscles had a similar distribution, as indicated by the linear correlation observed between the amplitudes of VR-EPSPs in the same motoneuron elicited by stimulation of muscle nerves innervating synergistic muscles. No such linear correlation was observed between VR-EPSP amplitudes when muscle nerves innervating antagonistic muscles were stimulated. 4. Small-amplitude, spikelike potentials were often observed on top of the muscle nerve VR-EPSPs. In the case of VR-EPSPs elicited by stimulation of muscle nerves not containing the axon from the recorded motoneuron, the spikelike component accounted for a major part of the response. These spikelike potentials had a rapid time course (half-decay time, 2.5-5.9 ms) and in a few cases were observed to be all or none. These observations are consistent with dendritic action potentials in the recorded motoneuron as well as electrotonic coupling between a small number of neurons close to the recording site in the impaled motoneuron. 5. These results are interpreted to mean that a high degree of specificity exists in the organization of electrical coupling among frog lumbar motoneurons.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Y. Malyshev and T. P. Norekian
Phase-Locked Coordination Between Two Rhythmically Active Feeding Structures in the Mollusk Clione limacina. I. Motor Neurons
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2996 - 3005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online