|
|
||||||||
Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 50, Issue 4 743-769, Copyright © 1983 by APS
ARTICLES |
P. Rudomin, I. Jimenez, M. Solodkin and S. Duenas
The present series of investigations was aimed to disclose the possible sites of action of excitatory and inhibitory inputs on tho-interneuron pathway mediating the primary afferent depolarization (PAD) of group I afferents of extensor muscles in the cat spinal cord. To this end we compared the effects produced by stimulation of segmental and descending pathways on the PAD generated either by stimulation of group I fibers of flexor muscles or by intraspinal microstimulation. It was assumed that under the appropriate conditions the PAD produced by intraspinal microstimulation results from the activation of the last-order interneurons in the PAD pathway and may, therefore, allow detection pathway. The PAD of single group I afferent fibers was determined in barbiturate-anesthetized preparations by measuring the test stimulus current required to maintain a constant probability of antidromic firing. This was achieved by means of a feedback system that continuously adjusted the test stimulus current to the required values. The PAD of individual group Ia gastrocnemius soleus (GS) fibers that is produced by activation of the low-threshold afferents of the posterior biceps and semitendinosus nerve was found to be inhibited by conditioning stimulation of the relatively low-threshold cutaneous fibers and also by stimulation of supraspinal structures such as the ipsilateral brain stem reticular formation, the contralateral red nucleus, and the contralateral pyramidal tract. In contrast, the PAD of group Ia fibers produced by microstimulation applied in the intermediate nucleus could be inhibited only by stimulation of the brain stem reticular formation but not by stimulation of the other descending inputs presently tested or by stimulation of cutaneous nerves. PAD of group Ia fibers was produced also by microstimulation applied within the motor nucleus. However, in most fibers the resulting PAD could not be inhibited either by stimulation of the brain stem reticular formation, the red nucleus, the pyramidal tract, or cutaneous nerves. Stimulation of cutaneous and of flexor muscle nerves of the brain stem reticular formation, the red nucleus, and the pyramidal tract all produced PAD of the group Ib GS fibers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Rossignol, R. Dubuc, and J.-P. Gossard Dynamic Sensorimotor Interactions in Locomotion Physiol Rev, January 1, 2006; 86(1): 89 - 154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A Perez, B. K. S Lungholt, and J. B Nielsen Presynaptic control of group Ia afferents in relation to acquisition of a visuo-motor skill in healthy humans J. Physiol., October 1, 2005; 568(1): 343 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Menard, H. Leblond, and J.-P. Gossard Sensory Integration in Presynaptic Inhibitory Pathways During Fictive Locomotion in the Cat J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2002; 88(1): 163 - 171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Gandevia Spinal and Supraspinal Factors in Human Muscle Fatigue Physiol Rev, October 1, 2001; 81(4): 1725 - 1789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Solodkin, I Jimenez, and P Rudomin Identification of common interneurons mediating pre- and postsynaptic inhibition in the cat spinal cord Science, June 29, 1984; 224(4656): 1453 - 1456. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |