|
|
||||||||
Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 51, Issue 1 147-163, Copyright © 1984 by APS
ARTICLES |
D. P. Phillips and S. S. Orman
In the auditory cortex of barbiturate-anesthetized cats, the posterior auditory field (field P) was identified by its tonotopic organization, and single neurons in that field were studied quantitatively for their sensitivity to the frequency and intensity of tonal stimuli presented via calibrated, sealed stimulating systems. Field P neurons had narrow, V-shaped, threshold frequency tuning curves. At suprathreshold levels, spike counts were generally greatest at frequencies at or close to the neuron's threshold best frequency (BF). Eighty-six percent of posterior-field neurons displayed spike counts that were a nonmonotonic function of the intensity of a BF tone. Of these, over 90% showed at least a 50% reduction in spike count at high stimulus levels, and almost 20% of nonmonotonic cells ceased responding entirely at high stimulus intensities. The nonmonotonic shape of spike count-versus-intensity profiles was typically preserved across the range of frequencies to which any given neuron was responsive. For some neurons, this had the consequence of generating a completely circumscribed frequency-intensity response area. That is, these neurons responded to a tonal stimulus only if the stimulus was within a restricted range of both frequency and intensity. These response areas showed internal organizations that appeared to reflect one or both of two processes. For some neurons, the optimal sound pressure level for spike counts varied with tone frequency, roughly paralleling the threshold tuning curve. For other neurons, the optimal sound pressure level tended to be constant across frequency despite threshold variations of up to 20 dB. The minimum response latencies of posterior-field neurons were generally in the range of 20-50 ms, while cells in the primary auditory cortex (AI) in the same animals generally had minimum latent periods of less than 20 ms. Comparison of these data with those previously presented for neurons in two other cortical auditory fields suggests that the cat's auditory cortex might show an interfield segregation of neurons according to their coding properties.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. L. Allman, R. E. Bittencourt-Navarrete, L. P. Keniston, A. E. Medina, M. Y. Wang, and M. A. Meredith Do Cross-Modal Projections Always Result in Multisensory Integration? Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2008; 18(9): 2066 - 2076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Malhotra, G. C. Stecker, J. C. Middlebrooks, and S. G. Lomber Sound Localization Deficits During Reversible Deactivation of Primary Auditory Cortex and/or the Dorsal Zone J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2008; 99(4): 1628 - 1642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sadagopan and X. Wang Level Invariant Representation of Sounds by Populations of Neurons in Primary Auditory Cortex J. Neurosci., March 26, 2008; 28(13): 3415 - 3426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. K. Pandya, D. L. Rathbun, R. Moucha, N. D. Engineer, and M. P. Kilgard Spectral and Temporal Processing in Rat Posterior Auditory Cortex Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2008; 18(2): 301 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Gourevitch and J. J. Eggermont Evaluating Information Transfer Between Auditory Cortical Neurons J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 2533 - 2543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Lomber, S. Malhotra, and J. M. Sprague Restoration of Acoustic Orienting Into a Cortically Deaf Hemifield by Reversible Deactivation of the Contralesional Superior Colliculus: The Acoustic "Sprague Effect" J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 979 - 993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Malhotra and S. G. Lomber Sound Localization During Homotopic and Heterotopic Bilateral Cooling Deactivation of Primary and Nonprimary Auditory Cortical Areas in the Cat J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 26 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Gourevitch and J. J. Eggermont Spatial Representation of Neural Responses to Natural and Altered Conspecific Vocalizations in Cat Auditory Cortex J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 144 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Eggermont Properties of Correlated Neural Activity Clusters in Cat Auditory Cortex Resemble Those of Neural Assemblies J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2006; 96(2): 746 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Bizley, F. R. Nodal, I. Nelken, and A. J. King Functional Organization of Ferret Auditory Cortex Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2005; 15(10): 1637 - 1653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. A. Kalatsky, D. B. Polley, M. M. Merzenich, C. E. Schreiner, and M. P. Stryker Fine functional organization of auditory cortex revealed by Fourier optical imaging PNAS, September 13, 2005; 102(37): 13325 - 13330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Tian and J. P. Rauschecker Processing of Frequency-Modulated Sounds in the Lateral Auditory Belt Cortex of the Rhesus Monkey J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2004; 92(5): 2993 - 3013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Malhotra, A. J. Hall, and S. G. Lomber Cortical Control of Sound Localization in the Cat: Unilateral Cooling Deactivation of 19 Cerebral Areas J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1625 - 1643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Sutter and W. C. Loftus Excitatory and Inhibitory Intensity Tuning in Auditory Cortex: Evidence for Multiple Inhibitory Mechanisms J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2003; 90(4): 2629 - 2647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Stecker, B. J. Mickey, E. A. Macpherson, and J. C. Middlebrooks Spatial Sensitivity in Field PAF of Cat Auditory Cortex J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 2889 - 2903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Heil and H. Neubauer A unifying basis of auditory thresholds based on temporal summation PNAS, May 13, 2003; 100(10): 6151 - 6156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Brechmann, F. Baumgart, and H. Scheich Sound-Level-Dependent Representation of Frequency Modulations in Human Auditory Cortex: A Low-Noise fMRI Study J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 423 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. C. Loftus and M. L. Sutter Spectrotemporal Organization of Excitatory and Inhibitory Receptive Fields of Cat Posterior Auditory Field Neurons J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2001; 86(1): 475 - 491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Cheung, P. H. Bedenbaugh, S. S. Nagarajan, and C. E. Schreiner Functional Organization of Squirrel Monkey Primary Auditory Cortex: Responses to Pure Tones J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2001; 85(4): 1732 - 1749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Eggermont Sound-Induced Synchronization of Neural Activity Between and Within Three Auditory Cortical Areas J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 2708 - 2722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Heil and D. R. F. Irvine Functional Specialization in Auditory Cortex: Responses to Frequency-Modulated Stimuli in the Cat's Posterior Auditory Field J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1998; 79(6): 3041 - 3059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Tian and J. P. Rauschecker Processing of Frequency-Modulated Sounds in the Cat's Posterior Auditory Field J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1998; 79(5): 2629 - 2642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |