JN AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 51: 185-194, 1984;
0022-3077/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKeon, B.
Right arrow Articles by Burke, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McKeon, B.
Right arrow Articles by Burke, D.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 51, Issue 2 185-194, Copyright © 1984 by APS

ARTICLES

Absence of somatotopic projection of muscle afferents onto motoneurons of same muscle

B. McKeon, S. Gandevia and D. Burke

During weak voluntary contractions, muscle afferents from a restricted region of the tibialis anterior of humans were activated with mechanical or electrical stimuli while electromyographic recordings (EMG) were made from pairs of motor units. One motor unit of a pair was located in the region of muscle from which the afferents arose; the other was at least 10 cm distal. The territories of the motor units of each pair did not overlap. All motor units were of low threshold, recruited at less than 5% of maximal voluntary strength. Direct recordings of muscle afferent activity, using a microelectrode in the nerve fascicle innervating the tibialis anterior, showed that taps delivered to the muscle belly activated submaximally a discrete population of receptors, restricted to the site of the taps. The spread of the disturbance set up by the taps or by vibration at 100 Hz applied to the muscle belly was measured with an accelerometer and was also found to be restricted to the site of application of the vibrator tip. With each of 12 pairs of motor units, vibration at 100 Hz was applied to the muscle near the motor unit of higher threshold for recruitment in a voluntary contraction. The vibration produced detectable reflex effects but did not alter recruitment order within any pair of motor units. During voluntary contractions involving 10 pairs of motor units, taps were applied to the muscle belly near each motor unit of a pair. The taps produced, at short latency, an increase in the probability of discharge of each motor unit. This change in probability is related to a composite excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) caused by dynamically responding mechanoreceptors near the tap site and is generated through monosynaptic/oligosynaptic pathways. Taps near one motor unit of a pair did not selectively or preferentially affect the discharge of that motoneuron. During a voluntary contraction of tibialis anterior, electrical stimuli just below threshold for efferent axons, and so probably above threshold for afferent axons, were delivered singly and in brief trains through a microelectrode in a nerve fascicle innervating that muscle. Such stimulation had no detectable effect on the discharge pattern of four pairs of motor units. These findings suggest that the feedback from a few receptors in the muscle has a negligible effect on the motoneuron pool, in comparison with the total excitatory drive present during a voluntary contraction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online