JN AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 51: 387-403, 1984;
0022-3077/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, D. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, D. V.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 51, Issue 2 387-403, Copyright © 1984 by APS

ARTICLES

Spike aftercurrents in R15 of Aplysia: their relationship to slow inward current and calcium influx

D. V. Lewis

Spikes in the bursting neuron, R15, are followed by depolarizing afterpotentials (35) and often by delayed hyperpolarizing afterpotentials as well. Placing the cell in a voltage clamp after a spike allows measurement of the depolarizing aftercurrent (DAC) and hyperpolarizing aftercurrent (HAC) that underlie the afterpotentials. Subthreshold depolarizations give rise to small DACs and HACs. The DAC and the slow inward current (SIC) of R15 are reduced or blocked in a similar manner by many experimental manipulations, e.g., application of dopamine, zero-calcium seawater, zero-sodium seawater, or calcium-channel blockers (Mn2+ and La3+), or cooling the cell from 21-22 degrees C to 10 degrees C. Neither the DAC nor the SIC were blocked by tetrodotoxin (100 uM) and neither was sensitive to altered extracellular potassium. Both the DAC and SIC become larger as the holding potential of the cell is progressively depolarized from -70 to -40 mV. DACs are sensitive to the injection of intracellular calcium chelators (EGTA (ethylene glycol-bis(beta-aminoethyl ether)-N,N1-tetraacetic acid) or EDTA [ethylenedinitrilo)tetraacetic acid]. DAC amplitude is approximately 90% reduced by intracellular EGTA concentration near 1mM. In contrast, the SIC is unchanged or much less affected by the calcium buffers. DACs are also more sensitive to low (1 mM) extracellular calcium than is the SIC. The HAC is also a calcium-dependent current. It is blocked by any experimental manipulation reducing calcium influx or intracellular calcium accumulation, i.e., reduced extracellular calcium, calcium-channel blockers, or intracellular EGTA. We suggest that the DAC and the SIC are carried by the same conductance mechanism. In the case of the DAC, the conductance might be activated by a rise in intracellular calcium activity accompanying the spike and, in the case of the SIC, depolarization per se may be the most important activating condition.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
G. F. Wilson, F. C. Richardson, T. E. Fisher, B. M. Olivera, and L. K. Kaczmarek
Identification and Characterization of a Ca2+-Sensitive Nonspecific Cation Channel Underlying Prolonged Repetitive Firing in Aplysia Neurons
J. Neurosci., June 1, 1996; 16(11): 3661 - 3671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online