JN Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Neurophysiol 51: 1055-1076, 1984;
0022-3077/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKenna, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Whitsel, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McKenna, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Whitsel, B. L.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 51, Issue 5 1055-1076, Copyright © 1984 by APS

ARTICLES

Neurons with unusual response and receptive-field properties in upper laminae of cat SI cortex

T. M. McKenna, A. R. Light and B. L. Whitsel

High-impedance micropipettes are used to record (both extra- and intracellularly) the electrical activity of neural elements located 550 micron or less from the pial surface of cerebral cortical areas 3a, 3b, 1, and 2 in unanesthetized cats. These elements are designated as "upper-layer SI units" and most frequently are sampled within the arm and forelimb digit sectors of areas 3b and 1. Mechanical stimulation of the skin is employed to determine the receptive field (RF) and response properties of the upper-layer units sampled. Single-shock electrical stimulation of the skin is used to obtain estimates of the minimal latency for eliciting spike discharge. Intracellular iontophoretic injection of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) is used to determine the laminar locations of the somata of the neural elements from which recordings are obtained. The receptive field (RF) and response properties of most upper-layer units sampled in areas 3b and 1 differ substantially from those of units recorded at depths greater than 550 micron from the pial surface in the same cortical fields. The members of one group of upper-layer area 3b and 1 units (U units) respond best to infrequently repeated (typically less than 0.5/s), slowly moving (1-5 cm/s) tactile stimuli. For the same units, repetitive application of slow-moving tactile stimuli to the RF typically leads to an enhancement of responsiveness accompanied by an elevation of spontaneous activity. In contrast, repetitive stimuli delivered at high velocity and at short interstimulus intervals lead to a decrease in unit responsiveness and to an absence of spontaneous activity. The members of a second group of upper-layer units (R units) respond best to moving stimuli delivered at higher velocities (5-20 cm/s), respond reliably at stimulus repetition rates well in excess of 0.5/s, and do not exhibit pronounced changes in responsiveness to repeated stimulation. The RFs of most upper-layer units (both R and U units) involve restricted regions on the contralateral upper limb, but the RFs of U units have poorly defined borders. In addition, the distribution of sensitivity within the RF of at least some U units is nonuniform and, frequently, discontinuous. Contralateral as well as ipsilateral body regions are included within the RFs for 12% of the upper-layer neurons sampled; the remainder (8%) have RFs restricted to the contralateral body.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cereb CortexHome page
B. Tutunculer, G. Foffani, B. T. Himes, and K. A. Moxon
Structure of the Excitatory Receptive Fields of Infragranular Forelimb Neurons in the Rat Primary Somatosensory Cortex Responding To Touch
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2006; 16(6): 791 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online