JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 51: 843-858, 1984;
0022-3077/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clemo, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Stein, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clemo, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by Stein, B. E.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 51, Issue 5 843-858, Copyright © 1984 by APS


ARTICLES

Topographic organization of somatosensory corticotectal influences in cat

H. R. Clemo and B. E. Stein

Using electrophysiological techniques, the present study demonstrated that substantial direct somatosensory cortical influences on the superior colliculus (SC) originate from three areas: a) SIV, b) para-SIV (the cortex adjacent to SIV but deeper in the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (AES) and for which no topography has yet been described), and c) the rostral suprasylvian sulcus. Influences also appeared to originate from SI and SII, but these may have been indirect. Detailed examination of the AES revealed that these corticotectal projections are topographically organized, and stimulation of a given cortical locus was observed to affect only those cells in the SC whose receptive fields overlapped those of cells at the stimulation site. A similar receptive-field register was found between the suprasylvian sulcus and the SC. Within this topographic pattern, considerable convergence was evident and an individual SC cell could be influenced from a surprisingly large cortical area. This was particularly evident within the representation of the forelimb. Thus, an SC cell with a receptive field covering the forelimb and paw could receive convergent input from many cortical cells with receptive fields covering all or restricted portions of this body region. Considerable corticotectal divergence also was observed within this general topographic scheme. For example, a given corticotectal site representing the digits sent projections to many different SC cells that included the digits within their receptive fields. These data are more consistent with a block-to-block than a point-to-point corticotectal projection. Somatosensory corticotectal projections excited only those SC cells that could also be activated by peripheral somatosensory stimuli. Similarly, the caudal AES, which contains auditory cells, excited only those SC cells activated also by peripheral auditory stimuli. Yet convergent influences from both auditory and somatosensory regions of the AES were observed in the SC cells that could be activated by both auditory and somatosensory stimuli. These data indicate that the AES is a major source of excitatory input to cells of the deep laminae of the SC. Since it is these deep laminae cells that project to premotor regions of the brain stem and the spinal cord, it is reasonable to suppose that the AES has a significant impact on the output signals of the SC that initiate the orientation responses to peripheral sensory stimulation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. N. Carriere, D. W. Royal, and M. T. Wallace
Spatial Heterogeneity of Cortical Receptive Fields and Its Impact on Multisensory Interactions
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2357 - 2368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. N. Carriere, D. W. Royal, T. J. Perrault, S. P. Morrison, J. W. Vaughan, B. E. Stein, and M. T. Wallace
Visual Deprivation Alters the Development of Cortical Multisensory Integration
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 2858 - 2867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. G. Lomber, S. Malhotra, and J. M. Sprague
Restoration of Acoustic Orienting Into a Cortically Deaf Hemifield by Reversible Deactivation of the Contralesional Superior Colliculus: The Acoustic "Sprague Effect"
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 979 - 993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. Jiang, H. Jiang, and B. E. Stein
Neonatal Cortical Ablation Disrupts Multisensory Development in Superior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2006; 95(3): 1380 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Malhotra, A. J. Hall, and S. G. Lomber
Cortical Control of Sound Localization in the Cat: Unilateral Cooling Deactivation of 19 Cerebral Areas
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1625 - 1643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
L. R. Dehner, L. P. Keniston, H. R. Clemo, and M. A. Meredith
Cross-modal Circuitry Between Auditory and Somatosensory Areas of the Cat Anterior Ectosylvian Sulcal Cortex: A 'New' Inhibitory Form of Multisensory Convergence
Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2004; 14(4): 387 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
W. Jiang, H. Jiang, and B. E. Stein
Two Corticotectal Areas Facilitate Multisensory Orientation Behavior
J. Cogn. Neurosci., November 1, 2002; 14(8): 1240 - 1255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. Jiang, M. T. Wallace, H. Jiang, J. W. Vaughan, and B. E. Stein
Two Cortical Areas Mediate Multisensory Integration in Superior Colliculus Neurons
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2001; 85(2): 506 - 522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online