Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 52, Issue 4 653-675, Copyright © 1984 by APS

ARTICLES

Phase-dependent responses evoked in limb muscles by stimulation of medullary reticular formation during locomotion in thalamic cats

T. Drew and S. Rossignol

Electromyographic and kinematic responses of all four limbs were studied when loci within the medullary reticular formation (MRF) were stimulated (30-ms train of 0.2-ms pulses at 300 Hz, strength 35 microA) during treadmill locomotion in spontaneously walking thalamic cats. Responses could be evoked in flexor or extensor muscles of any given limb by such stimulation, depending on the time during the step cycle at which the stimulus was delivered. Stimulation normally excited flexor muscles but could either excite or inhibit extensor muscles depending on the exact position of the electrode. Excitatory responses in extensor muscles were often followed by a short period of inhibition of activity. The responses in muscles of the opposing limbs of the same girdle were, in general, reciprocally organized. For instance, a stimulus delivered during the swing phase of the ipsilateral limb normally evoked excitatory responses both in flexor muscles of that limb and in extensor muscles of the contralateral limb. The same stimulus delivered during the stance phase of the ipsilateral limb evoked excitatory responses in ipsilateral extensor muscles and in contralateral flexor muscles. Responses were also observed at the same time in fore- and hindlimbs that were well organized with respect to the locomotor cycle. Seventy-five percent of all responses occurred within 8-20 ms of the onset of the stimulus train. Responses evoked in muscles of the opposing limbs of one girdle (e.g., a flexor of one limb and an extensor of the other) had similar latencies, suggesting that the responses were synchronously organized on both sides of the body rather than one being a consequence of the other. Although the majority of responses in a given muscle were elicited during its period of activity, responses could occasionally be evoked when there was no activity in that muscle or could be absent despite activity in the muscle. The short trains of stimuli were normally potent enough to affect the limb trajectory, which reflected changes in the onset or the offset of the activity of most muscles. Thus the stimuli effectively changed both the duration of the period of activity in these muscles and the overall step cycle. Longer trains of stimuli (200 ms) markedly amplified these changes to the point of completely resetting the locomotor rhythm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. G. Davidson, M. H. Schieber, and J. A. Buford Bilateral Spike-Triggered Average Effects in Arm and Shoulder Muscles from the Monkey Pontomedullary Reticular Formation J. Neurosci., July 25, 2007; 27(30): 8053 - 8058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Barthelemy, H. Leblond, J. Provencher, and S. Rossignol Nonlocomotor and Locomotor Hindlimb Responses Evoked by Electrical Microstimulation of the Lumbar Cord in Spinalized Cats J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 3273 - 3292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Schepens and T. Drew Descending Signals From the Pontomedullary Reticular Formation Are Bilateral, Asymmetric, and Gated During Reaching Movements in the Cat J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2006; 96(5): 2229 - 2252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. I. Ustinova, A. G. Feldman, and M. F. Levin Central Resetting of Neuromuscular Steady States May Underlie Rhythmical Arm Movements J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1124 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Bretzner and T. Drew Changes in Corticospinal Efficacy Contribute to the Locomotor Plasticity Observed After Unilateral Cutaneous Denervation of the Hindpaw in the Cat J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2911 - 2927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Bretzner and T. Drew Contribution of the Motor Cortex to the Structure and the Timing of Hindlimb Locomotion in the Cat: A Microstimulation Study J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 657 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Bretzner and T. Drew Motor Cortical Modulation of Cutaneous Reflex Responses in the Hindlimb of the Intact Cat J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 673 - 687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Saltiel and S. Rossignol Critical Points in the Forelimb Fictive Locomotor Cycle and Motor Coordination: Evidence From the Effects of Tonic Proprioceptive Perturbations in the Cat J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1329 - 1341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. G. Davidson and J. A. Buford Motor Outputs From the Primate Reticular Formation to Shoulder Muscles as Revealed by Stimulus-Triggered Averaging J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 83 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. R. Noga, D. J. Kriellaars, R. M. Brownstone, and L. M. Jordan Mechanism for Activation of Locomotor Centers in the Spinal Cord by Stimulation of the Mesencephalic Locomotor Region J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2003; 90(3): 1464 - 1478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. D. Prentice and T. Drew Contributions of the Reticulospinal System to the Postural Adjustments Occurring During Voluntary Gait Modifications J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2001; 85(2): 679 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Matsuyama and T. Drew Vestibulospinal and Reticulospinal Neuronal Activity During Locomotion in the Intact Cat. II. Walking on an Inclined Plane J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2000; 84(5): 2257 - 2276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-J. Rho, S. Lavoie, and T. Drew Effects of Red Nucleus Microstimulation on the Locomotor Pattern and Timing in the Intact Cat: A Comparison With the Motor Cortex J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1999; 81(5): 2297 - 2315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Brustein and S. Rossignol Recovery of Locomotion After Ventral and Ventrolateral Spinal Lesions in the Cat. I. Deficits and Adaptive Mechanisms J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1998; 80(3): 1245 - 1267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. K. Magnuson and T. C. Trinder Locomotor Rhythm Evoked by Ventrolateral Funiculus Stimulation in the Neonatal Rat Spinal Cord In Vitro J Neurophysiol, January 1, 1997; 77(1): 200 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]