JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 52: 1169-1180, 1984;
0022-3077/84 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gidda, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Goyal, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gidda, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Goyal, R. K.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 52, Issue 6 1169-1180, Copyright © 1984 by APS


ARTICLES

Swallow-evoked action potentials in vagal preganglionic efferents

J. S. Gidda and R. K. Goyal

Swallow-evoked potentials in the preganglionic vagal fibers were studied using the single-fiber recording technique in anesthetized opossums. Swallows were evoked by tactile pharyngeal stimulation or electrical stimulation of the cut central end of the superior laryngeal nerve (SLN). Swallowing activity was recorded by the mylohyoid electromyogram and esophageal motility. Sixty-six fibers were studied in which swallowing evoked action potentials. The latencies (from the onset of mylohyoid activity) of evoked responses in different fibers varied from 100 ms to 5 s. The discharge rate of the evoked response was 3-8 action potentials per burst. Each burst lasted 1.1 +/- 0.02 (SE)s. The latencies of evoked spike bursts showed a bimodal distribution. In 34 fibers the latencies were less than 1 s, and in 32 fibers the latencies ranged between 1 and 5 s; these are the short- and long-latency fibers, respectively. Short-latency fibers could easily be distinguished from long-latency fibers based on the influence of SLN-stimulus frequency. Short-latency discharges had low thresholds of activation and were sensitive to changes in the frequency of SLN stimulation, since their latencies decreased and their discharge rate increased with increasing SLN-stimulus frequency. On the other hand, the latencies and discharge rates of long-latency discharges were not modified with changing SLN stimulus frequencies. The conduction velocities of 6 short- and 9 long-latency fibers were 5.64 +/- 0.12 and 5.78 +/- 0.12 (SE) m/s, respectively (P greater than 0.05). The relationship between the latencies of swallow-evoked discharges in the short- and long-latency fibers and the esophageal smooth muscle responses suggested that the short-latency discharges may correlate with the latency of initial inhibition, and the long-latency fibers may correlate with latencies of peristaltic contractions. Based on these temporal relationships, we speculate that vagal efferent fibers showing swallow-evoked, short-latency discharges make contact with intramural inhibitory neurons. They may mediate deglutitive inhibition in the body of the esophagus, relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter, and receptive relaxation of the fundus of the stomach. The fibers showing late discharges make contact with intramural excitatory neurons and participate in their sequential activation. This dual pathway of activation may be responsible for physiological esophageal peristalsis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
M.-C. L'Heureux, A. Muinuddin, H. Y. Gaisano, and N. E. Diamant
Feline lower esophageal sphincter sling and circular muscles have different functional inhibitory neuronal responses
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, January 1, 2006; 290(1): G23 - G29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
H. Y. Chang, H. Mashimo, and R. K. Goyal
Musings on the Wanderer: What's New in Our Understanding of Vago-Vagal Reflex?: IV. Current concepts of vagal efferent projections to the gut
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, March 1, 2003; 284(3): G357 - G366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
A. Jean
Brain Stem Control of Swallowing: Neuronal Network and Cellular Mechanisms
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2001; 81(2): 929 - 969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
S. Yamato, I. Hirano, and R. K. Goyal
Effect of galanin and galanin antagonists on peristalsis in esophageal smooth muscle in the opossum
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, October 1, 2000; 279(4): G719 - G725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
I. M. Lang, B. K. Medda, J. Ren, and R. Shaker
Characterization and mechanisms of the pharyngoesophageal inhibitory reflex
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, November 1, 1998; 275(5): G1127 - G1136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
R K Mittal, C Chiareli, J Liu, R H Holloway, and W Dixon Jr
Atropine inhibits gastric distension and pharyngeal receptor mediated lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation
Gut, September 1, 1997; 41(3): 285 - 290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online