JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 53: 89-109, 1985;
0022-3077/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harnischfeger, G.
Right arrow Articles by Schlegel, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harnischfeger, G.
Right arrow Articles by Schlegel, P.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 53, Issue 1 89-109, Copyright © 1985 by APS


ARTICLES

Interaural time and intensity coding in superior olivary complex and inferior colliculus of the echolocating bat Molossus ater

G. Harnischfeger, G. Neuweiler and P. Schlegel

Single-unit responses to tonal stimulation with interaural disparities were recorded in the nuclei of the superior olivary complex (SOC) and the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC) of the echolocating bat, Molossus ater. Seventy-six units were recorded from the ICC and 74 from the SOC; of the SOC units, 31 were histologically verified in the medial superior olive (MSO), 10 in the lateral superior olive (LSO), and 33 in unidentified areas of the SOC. Best frequencies (BFs) of the units ranged from 10.3 to 89.6 kHz, and Q10 dB values ranged from 2 to 70 dB. Most ICC neurons responded phasically to stimulus onset and were either inhibitory/excitatory [I/E; (53)] or excitatory/excitatory [E/E; (21)] units. In the MSO, 23 units responded tonically and 7 phasically on, 18 were E/E or E/OF (facilitatory for other input) units, and 11 were I/E neurons. All LSO neurons responded in a "chopper" fashion, and the binaural neurons were E/I units. In E/E units the excitatory response to binaural stimulation was frequently larger than the sum of the monaurally evoked responses. Many neurons with E/I or I/E inputs had very steep binaural impulse-count functions and were sensitive to small interaural intensity differences. Twenty-eight units (24%) responded with a change in firing rate of at least 20% to interaural time differences of +/- 500 microseconds. Within this sample, 11 units (8 from ICC, 2 from MSO, and 1 from SOC) were sensitive to interaural time differences of only +/- 50 microseconds. Of these 11 units, 10 were I/E units responding phasically only to stimulus onset and were also sensitive to intensity differences (delta I), being suppressed completely by the inhibitory input over a delta I range of 20 dB or less. Of 117 units tested in the ICC and SOC nuclei, 86 units (76%) were not sensitive to interaural time disparities within +/- 500 microseconds. Because the BFs of these units sensitive to interaural transient time differences (delta t) ranged between 18 and 90 kHz, responses were elicited by pure tones, and responses did not change periodically with the period equal to that of the stimulus frequency, we conclude that the neurons reacted to interaural differences of stimulus-onset time (transient time difference) but not to phase differences (ongoing time difference). Sensitivity to interaural time differences was also correlated with interaural intensity differences.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
D. M. Caspary, L. Ling, J. G. Turner, and L. F. Hughes
Inhibitory neurotransmission, plasticity and aging in the mammalian central auditory system
J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2008; 211(11): 1781 - 1791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. J. Park, A. Klug, M. Holinstat, and B. Grothe
Interaural Level Difference Processing in the Lateral Superior Olive and the Inferior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 289 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D.R.F. Irvine, V. N. Park, and L. McCormick
Mechanisms Underlying the Sensitivity of Neurons in the Lateral Superior Olive to Interaural Intensity Differences
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2001; 86(6): 2647 - 2666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. Grothe, E. Covey, and J. H. Casseday
Medial Superior Olive of the Big Brown Bat: Neuronal Responses to Pure Tones, Amplitude Modulations, and Pulse Trains
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2001; 86(5): 2219 - 2230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Kozloski and J. D. Crawford
Transformations of an Auditory Temporal Code in the Medulla of a Sound-Producing Fish
J. Neurosci., March 15, 2000; 20(6): 2400 - 2408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Klug, E. E. Bauer, and G. D. Pollak
Multiple Components of Ipsilaterally Evoked Inhibition in the Inferior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 593 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. P. Oswald, A. Klug, and T. J. Park
Interaural Intensity Difference Processing in Auditory Midbrain Neurons: Effects of a Transient Early Inhibitory Input
J. Neurosci., February 1, 1999; 19(3): 1149 - 1163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
B. Grothe and T. J. Park
Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences in the Medial Superior Olive of a Small Mammal, the Mexican Free-Tailed Bat
J. Neurosci., August 15, 1998; 18(16): 6608 - 6622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
V. C. Kotak, S. Korada, I. R. Schwartz, and D. H. Sanes
A Developmental Shift from GABAergic to Glycinergic Transmission in the Central Auditory System
J. Neurosci., June 15, 1998; 18(12): 4646 - 4655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. H. Sanes, B. J. Malone, and M. N. Semple
Role of Synaptic Inhibition in Processing of Dynamic Binaural Level Stimuli
J. Neurosci., January 15, 1998; 18(2): 794 - 803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Batra, S. Kuwada, and D. C. Fitzpatrick
Sensitivity to Interaural Temporal Disparities of Low- and High-Frequency Neurons in the Superior Olivary Complex. I. Heterogeneity of Responses
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1997; 78(3): 1222 - 1236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. J. Park, P. Monsivais, and G. D. Pollak
Processing of Interaural Intensity Differences in the LSO: Role of Interaural Threshold Differences
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1997; 77(6): 2863 - 2878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. Grothe, T. J. Park, and G. Schuller
Medial Superior Olive in the Free-Tailed Bat: Response to Pure Tones and Amplitude-Modulated Tones
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 1997; 77(3): 1553 - 1565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. J. Park, B. Grothe, G. D. Pollak, G. Schuller, and U. Koch
Neural Delays Shape Selectivity to Interaural Intensity Differences in the Lateral Superior Olive
J. Neurosci., October 15, 1996; 16(20): 6554 - 6566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online