JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 53: 686-698, 1985;
0022-3077/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nussbaumer, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Van der Loos, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nussbaumer, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Van der Loos, H.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 53, Issue 3 686-698, Copyright © 1985 by APS


ARTICLES

An electrophysiological and anatomical study of projections to the mouse cortical barrelfield and its surroundings

J. C. Nussbaumer and H. Van der Loos

This study establishes a cortical map of the somatosensory periphery of the mouse head, with emphasis on the whisker pad. Data in the literature on the projection of the common hair follicles are confusing, notably the question whether or not this projection is separated from or overlaps with that of the facial vibrissae, the barrelfield. Microelectrode recordings in the barrelfield and its immediate surroundings upon natural stimulation of the periphery were followed by microlesions and histological reconstruction. Results show that the barrelfield consists of two parts: an anterior part where vibrissal follicles and the skin bearing them are represented, and a posterior part receiving only vibrissa inputs. The skin between these latter vibrissae is represented outside the barrelfield. We conclude that the partially dissociated cortical representation of skin and vibrissae may allow large vibrissae to be used in tasks requiring greater acuity than the shorter ones provide. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that, owing to special muscles, large vibrissae are more mobile than short ones. We also propose that the segregation of inputs from vibrissae and common fur is related to the number of nerve fibers serving one follicle, and we indicate an experimental model to test this possibility.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online