JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 53: 1467-1482, 1985;
0022-3077/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Semple, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kitzes, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Semple, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Kitzes, L. M.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 53, Issue 6 1467-1482, Copyright © 1985 by APS


ARTICLES

Single-unit responses in the inferior colliculus: different consequences of contralateral and ipsilateral auditory stimulation

M. N. Semple and L. M. Kitzes

Monaural excitatory responses of 181 single units in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus of 15 anesthetized gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) were examined quantitatively. Pure-tone stimuli were presented monaurally through sealed, calibrated sound-delivery systems. Most units were excited only by contralateral stimulation (EO); 23% were bilaterally excitable (EE). The threshold frequency tuning curves for contralateral stimulation of EE units were significantly broader than those produced by ipsilateral stimulation of EE units and those produced by contralateral stimulation of EO units. The frequency at which threshold was lowest (best frequency), or BF) was very similar for ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation of individual EE units; however, ipsilateral BFs were slightly but significantly lower than contralateral BFs. For EE units, ipsilateral BF thresholds (mean: 29.2 dB SPL) were significantly higher than contralateral BF thresholds (mean: 14.9 dB SPL). Monotonic and nonmonotonic relationships between discharge rate and stimulus intensity at BF were observed in responses evoked both by contralateral and ipsilateral stimulation. Interestingly, for individual EE units it was not uncommon for the rate/intensity function for one monaural condition to be monotonic although the relationship for stimulation of the other ear was markedly nonmonotonic. There was no qualitative difference between rate/intensity functions evoked by contralateral stimulation in EO and EE units. Ipsilateral discharge rates were characteristically much lower than contralateral rates for a given stimulus intensity. For 50 BF tones of 100 ms duration, the median peak numbers of discharges for contralateral stimulation of EO and EE units were 361 and 339, respectively; the median for ipsilateral stimulation of EE units was 102. The dynamic range of each rate/intensity function was calculated by measuring the intensity range associated with an increase in spike count from 10 to 90% of the peak rate. No differences were detected between the distributions of dynamic range for contralateral stimulation in EO or EE units, or between contralateral and ipsilateral dynamic ranges within individual EE units. For all response types the distributions of dynamic range were approximately normal, with means near 20 dB. The minimum mean latency to the first spike at BF was generally longer for ipsilateral than for contralateral responses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. G. Sinex, H. Li, and D. S. Velenovsky
Prevalence of Stereotypical Responses to Mistuned Complex Tones in the Inferior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 3523 - 3537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Sivaramakrishnan, S. J. Sterbing-D'Angelo, B. Filipovic, W. R. D'Angelo, D. L. Oliver, and S. Kuwada
GABAA Synapses Shape Neuronal Responses to Sound Intensity in the Inferior Colliculus
J. Neurosci., May 26, 2004; 24(21): 5031 - 5043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. L. Snyder and D. G. Sinex
Immediate Changes in Tuning of Inferior Colliculus Neurons Following Acute Lesions of Cat Spiral Ganglion
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 434 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. K. Shepherd, J. H. Baxi, and N. A. Hardie
Response of Inferior Colliculus Neurons to Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve in Neonatally Deafened Cats
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1999; 82(3): 1363 - 1380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Klug, E. E. Bauer, and G. D. Pollak
Multiple Components of Ipsilaterally Evoked Inhibition in the Inferior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 593 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. A. Davis, R. Ramachandran, and B. J. May
Single-Unit Responses in the Inferior Colliculus of Decerebrate Cats II. Sensitivity to Interaural Level Differences
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 1999; 82(1): 164 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. W. Spitzer and M. N. Semple
Transformation of Binaural Response Properties in the Ascending Auditory Pathway: Influence of Time-Varying Interaural Phase Disparity
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 1998; 80(6): 3062 - 3076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. McAlpine, R. L. Martin, J. E. Mossop, and D. R. Moore
Response Properties of Neurons in the Inferior Colliculus of the Monaurally Deafened Ferret to Acoustic Stimulation of the Intact Ear
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1997; 78(2): 767 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online