JN AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 54: 1050-1067, 1985;
0022-3077/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duysens, J.
Right arrow Articles by Cremieux, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duysens, J.
Right arrow Articles by Cremieux, J.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 54, Issue 4 1050-1067, Copyright © 1985 by APS


ARTICLES

Velocity selectivity in the cat visual system. II. Independence from interactions between different loci

J. Duysens, G. A. Orban and J. Cremieux

To investigate the dependence of velocity characteristics on spatiotemporal interactions the velocity selectivity of 15 geniculate and 72 cortical cells (areas 17 and 18) was examined with light and dark bars before and after masking all but the most sensitive part of the receptive field. The use of a 0.3 degree window proved effective in eliminating enough spatiotemporal interactions to abolish cortical direction selectivity. The same window improved the responsiveness at high velocities in only 26% of the cortical cells preferring low velocities and having a receptive field with nonoverlapping ON and OFF subregions. The remaining 74% showed various degrees of velocity-independent decrease in response amplitude. The only two geniculate cells that had a velocity upper cutoff lost this cutoff when tested with the mask. Cortical units preferring high velocities lost their responsiveness at high velocities in the mask condition, provided that their receptive fields contained nonoverlapping ON and OFF subregions. Cortical units, which responded best at intermediate velocities and which had receptive fields with nonoverlapping subregions, lost their sharp velocity tuning when tested with a mask. We conclude that inhibitory spatiotemporal interactions can account for the preference for low velocities in at most a quarter of the cells with nonoverlapping subregions. In contrast, facilitatory interactions seem to be important for cortical cells preferring high or intermediate velocities and having receptive fields with nonoverlapping subregions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. A. Razak and Z. M. Fuzessery
Neural Mechanisms Underlying Selectivity for the Rate and Direction of Frequency-Modulated Sweeps in the Auditory Cortex of the Pallid Bat
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1303 - 1319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. A. Razak and S. L. Pallas
Neural Mechanisms of Stimulus Velocity Tuning in the Superior Colliculus
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 3573 - 3589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online