Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 54, Issue 4 1068-1083, Copyright © 1985 by APS

ARTICLES

Velocity selectivity in the cat visual system. III. Contribution of temporal factors

J. Duysens, G. A. Orban, J. Cremieux and H. Maes

In 149 units from area 17 and 48 units from area 18 the responses to stationary stimulation of different durations were compared with the responses to the same stimulus (a 0.3 degrees-wide light or dark bar) moving at different velocities. The aim was to test the hypothesis that the range of effective velocities depends on the time needed for the bar to cross the receptive field. Forty-two percent of the area 17 cells and 8% of the area 18 cells responded poorly or not at all to briefly presented stationary stimulation. These cells were unable to respond at high velocities, and for these "duration-sensitive" cells the velocity characteristics are well predicted on the basis of responses to stationary stimulation of different durations. Cells that responded equally well to periods of stationary stimulation ranging from 12.5 to 3,200 ms ("duration-insensitive cells") were found to be able to respond at all equivalent velocities, but their preference for either high, low, or intermediate velocities was not reflected in differences in responsiveness to the different durations tested. Duration-sensitive cells in area 17 tended to have a receptive field near the area centralis, and 73% of them were classified as S-family cells, one third being end-stopped S-cells. In contrast only 18% of the duration-insensitive cells were of the S family, and these S-family cells were rarely end-stopped (1/12) or rarely had receptive fields within 5 degrees of the fovea (3/12). Duration-sensitive cells had very long latencies (median 285 ms) in response to a stationary flashed light bar of 1 s duration but much shorter latencies (median 91 ms) when tested with a slowly moving light bar. This difference was not seen in duration-insensitive cells (median latencies = 61 and 59 ms). The ability to respond at high velocity was contrast dependent. At a low contrast level all cells failed to respond to brief stimulation, whether moving or stationary. At high contrast levels only the duration-insensitive cells showed an increased responsivity to brief stimuli. The absence of responses in duration-sensitive cells to brief stimuli of high contrast may depend upon suppressive influences reaching these cells before the excitatory influences. We conclude that the velocity upper cutoff of most S-family cells with a central receptive field can be predicted from a knowledge of the minimum duration of stationary presentation required for their activation (median ON duration threshold, 200 ms).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. A. Razak and Z. M. Fuzessery Facilitatory Mechanisms Underlying Selectivity for the Direction and Rate of Frequency Modulated Sweeps in the Auditory Cortex J. Neurosci., September 24, 2008; 28(39): 9806 - 9816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Razak and Z. M. Fuzessery Neural Mechanisms Underlying Selectivity for the Rate and Direction of Frequency-Modulated Sweeps in the Auditory Cortex of the Pallid Bat J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1303 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Razak and S. L. Pallas Neural Mechanisms of Stimulus Velocity Tuning in the Superior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 3573 - 3589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]