JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 54: 1282-1294, 1985;
0022-3077/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoy, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoy, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. L.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 54, Issue 5 1282-1294, Copyright © 1985 by APS


ARTICLES

Contrasting roles of inertial and muscle moments at knee and ankle during paw-shake response

M. G. Hoy, R. F. Zernicke and J. L. Smith

Intralimb kinetics of the paw-shake response (PSR) were studied in four spinal, adult cats. Using rigid body equations of motion to determine the dynamic interactions between limb segments, knee and ankle joint kinetics were calculated for the steady-state cycles as defined in the preceding paper. Hindlimb motion was filmed (200 frames/s) to obtain knee and ankle kinematics. Responses of flexors and extensors at both joints were recorded synchronously with cinefilm. Ankle and knee joint kinematics were determined from 51 steady-state cycles of 16 PSRs. Average maximum displacements, velocities, and accelerations were substantially greater for the ankle than for the knee joint. Knee and ankle motions were out of phase in the first part of the cycle; knee extension occurred simultaneously with ankle flexion. In the second part of the cycle, motions at the two joints were sequential; rapid knee flexion, accompanied by negligible ankle displacement, preceded rapid ankle extension with minimal knee displacement. At the ankle joint, peak net moments tending to cause flexion and extension were similar in magnitude and determined primarily by muscle moments. Moments due to leg angular acceleration contributed significantly to an extensor peak in the net moment near the end of the cycle. Other inertial and gravitational moments were small. At the knee joint, net moments tending to cause flexion and extension were also similar, but smaller than those at the ankle. The knee muscle moments, however, were large and counteracted large inertial moments due to paw angular acceleration. Also, moments due to leg angular acceleration and knee linear acceleration were substantial and opposite in effect. Other inertial and the gravitational moments were negligible. Muscle moments slowed and reversed joint motions, and active muscle force components of muscle moments were derived from lengthening of active musculotendinous units. Segmental interactions, in which proximal segment motion augmented distal segment velocity, increased the effectiveness of PSR steady-state cycles by facilitating the generation of extremely large paw linear accelerations. Limb oscillations during PSR steady-state result from interactions between muscle synergies and motion-dependent limb dynamics. At the ankle, muscle activity functioned to control paw acceleration, whereas at the knee, muscle activity functioned to control leg and paw inertial interactions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
N. S. Bradley, D. Solanki, and D. Zhao
Limb Movements During Embryonic Development in the Chick: Evidence for a Continuum in Limb Motor Control Antecedent to Locomotion
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 4401 - 4411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Hirashima, K. Kudo, and T. Ohtsuki
Utilization and Compensation of Interaction Torques During Ball-Throwing Movements
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2003; 89(4): 1784 - 1796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. A. Martin, B. E. Greger, S. A. Norris, and W. T. Thach
Throwing Accuracy in the Vertical Direction During Prism Adaptation: Not Simply Timing of Ball Release
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2001; 85(5): 2298 - 2302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. E. Cooper, J. H. Martin, and C. Ghez
Effects of Inactivation of the Anterior Interpositus Nucleus on the Kinematic and Dynamic Control of Multijoint Movement
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2000; 84(4): 1988 - 2000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. J. Bastian, K. M. Zackowski, and W. T. Thach
Cerebellar Ataxia: Torque Deficiency or Torque Mismatch Between Joints?
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2000; 83(5): 3019 - 3030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. A. Sharp, E. Ma, and A. Bekoff
Developmental Changes in Leg Coordination of the Chick at Embryonic Days 9, 11, and 13: Uncoupling of Ankle Movements
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1999; 82(5): 2406 - 2414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online