JN AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 55: 776-805, 1986;
0022-3077/86 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suga, N.
Right arrow Articles by Horikawa, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suga, N.
Right arrow Articles by Horikawa, J.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 55, Issue 4 776-805, Copyright © 1986 by APS


ARTICLES

Multiple time axes for representation of echo delays in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat

N. Suga and J. Horikawa

The properties of the orientation sound (pulse) of the Jamaican mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii parnellii is the same as the Panamanian mustached bat, P.p. rubiginosus. It consists of four harmonics, each containing a long constant-frequency (CF) component followed by a short frequency-modulated (FM) component. Thus, there are eight components in total: CF1-4 and FM1-4. The combination-sensitive area of the auditory cortex in P.p. parnellii consists of two major divisions (FM-FM and CF/CF areas) as in P.p. rubiginosus. The FM-FM area projects to the dorsal fringe (DF) and other areas. Response latencies of neurons in the DF area are longer than those in the FM-FM area. The distribution of latencies is unimodal for the FM-FM area, but bimodal for the DF area. In this electrophysiological study of the response properties of neurons in the DF and FM-FM areas, our aim was to find out how signal processing might be different between the two areas. Both the FM-FM and DF areas consist of three types of FM-FM combination-sensitive neurons: FM1-FM2, FM1-FM3, and FM1-FM4. They do not respond or respond poorly to pulse alone, echo alone, single CF tones or single FM sounds. But they show strong facilitation of response to the echo when it is delivered with particular delays from the pulse. The essential elements in the pulse-echo pair for facilitation are the FM1 of the pulse and FM2 or FM3 or FM4 of the echo. In both the FM-FM and DF areas, the great majority of neurons show short-lasting facilitation, and other neurons show long-lasting facilitation. FM-FM neurons are tuned to particular echo delays, i.e., target ranges. In both the FM-FM and DF areas, the width of a delay-tuning curve is linearly related to the value of a best delay. There is no sign that processing of range information is more specialized in the DF area than the FM-FM area. In both the FM-FM and DF areas, three types of FM-FM neurons form independent clusters. Along the major axis of each cluster, best delays for facilitative responses of neurons systematically change according to the loci of the neurons. The more posterior the location, the longer the best delay is. Therefore, there are six time (i.e., range) axes in total. The time axis in the DF area is shorter than that in the FM-FM area.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Tang and N. Suga
Modulation of auditory processing by cortico-cortical feed-forward and feedback projections
PNAS, May 27, 2008; 105(21): 7600 - 7605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Tang, Z. Xiao, and N. Suga
Bilateral Cortical Interaction: Modulation of Delay-Tuned Neurons in the Contralateral Auditory Cortex
J. Neurosci., August 1, 2007; 27(31): 8405 - 8413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Smotherman and W. Metzner
Auditory-Feedback Control of Temporal Call Patterns in Echolocating Horseshoe Bats
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1295 - 1303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Z. Xiao and N. Suga
Reorganization of the auditory cortex specialized for echo-delay processing in the mustached bat
PNAS, February 10, 2004; 101(6): 1769 - 1774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. He
Slow Oscillation in Non-Lemniscal Auditory Thalamus
J. Neurosci., September 10, 2003; 23(23): 8281 - 8290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. S. Kanwal, D. C. Fitzpatrick, and N. Suga
Facilitatory and Inhibitory Frequency Tuning of Combination-Sensitive Neurons in the Primary Auditory Cortex of Mustached Bats
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1999; 82(5): 2327 - 2345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. J. Wenstrup
Frequency Organization and Responses to Complex Sounds in the Medial Geniculate Body of the Mustached Bat
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1999; 82(5): 2528 - 2544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Yan and N. Suga
Corticofugal Amplification of Facilitative Auditory Responses of Subcortical Combination-Sensitive Neurons in the Mustached Bat
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 1999; 81(2): 817 - 824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. E. Valentine and C. F. Moss
Spatially Selective Auditory Responses in the Superior Colliculus of the Echolocating Bat
J. Neurosci., March 1, 1997; 17(5): 1720 - 1733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
H Riquimaroux, S. Gaioni, and N Suga
Cortical computational maps control auditory perception
Science, February 1, 1991; 251(4993): 565 - 568.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online