Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 55, Issue 6 1136-1152, Copyright © 1986 by APS

ARTICLES

Spatial receptive-field properties of direction-selective neurons in cat striate cortex

C. L. Baker Jr and M. S. Cynader

Responses of direction-selective neurons in cat striate cortex (area 17) were studied with flashed-bar stimuli. Spatial parameters of interactions within the receptive field giving rise to direction selectivity and of receptive-field subunits were quantitatively determined for the same cells and correlated. A bar stimulus flashed sequentially at two nearby locations in the receptive field produced direction-selective behavior comparable with that elicited by continuously moving stimuli. Each cell exhibited a characteristic optimal spatial displacement, Dopt, for which responses in the presumed preferred and null directions were maximally distinct. In all cases, Dopt was much smaller than the receptive-field size. The spatial structure of receptive fields in simple cells was studied using single narrow-bar stimuli flashed at different locations in the receptive field. The resulting line-weighting function exhibited alternating regions of ON and OFF responses having a characteristic spatial period or wavelength, lambda. Spatial subunit structure in complex cells was determined by flashing two bars simultaneously in the receptive field. The response as a function of bar separation was again a wavelike function having a spatial wavelength, lambda. Values of the optimal displacement for direction selectivity, Dopt, showed a clear relationship with the spatial wavelength, lambda, for a given unit. Dopt was also correlated to a somewhat lesser degree with receptive-field size. Generally, the ratio of Dopt to lambda was approximately 1/10 to 1/4, in agreement with theoretical predictions by Marr and Poggio. Taken together with the findings of Movshon et al., these results indicate a systematic relationship between Dopt and the spatial frequency of a sinusoidal grating, which is optimal for that cell. Such a relationship is consistent with the results of human psychophysical experiments on apparent motion.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. C. Pack, B. R. Conway, R. T. Born, and M. S. Livingstone Spatiotemporal Structure of Nonlinear Subunits in Macaque Visual Cortex J. Neurosci., January 18, 2006; 26(3): 893 - 907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Mante and M. Carandini Mapping of Stimulus Energy in Primary Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 788 - 798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Churchland, N. J. Priebe, and S. G. Lisberger Comparison of the Spatial Limits on Direction Selectivity in Visual Areas MT and V1 J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1235 - 1245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Martinez and J.-M. Alonso Complex Receptive Fields in Primary Visual Cortex Neuroscientist, October 1, 2003; 9(5): 317 - 331. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Anzai, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman Neural Mechanisms for Encoding Binocular Disparity: Receptive Field Position Versus Phase J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 874 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Anzai, I. Ohzawa, and R. D. Freeman Neural Mechanisms for Processing Binocular Information II. Complex Cells J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 909 - 924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]