|
|
||||||||
Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 55, Issue 6 1328-1339, Copyright © 1986 by APS
ARTICLES |
A. Mikami, W. T. Newsome and R. H. Wurtz
We measured the spatial and temporal limits of directional interactions for 105 directionally selective middle temporal (MT) neurons and 26 directionally selective striate (V1) neurons. Directional interactions were measured using sequentially flashed stimuli in which the spatial and temporal intervals between stimuli were systematically varied over a broad range. A direction index was employed to determine the strength of directional interactions for each combination of spatial and temporal intervals tested. The maximum spatial interval for which directional interactions occurred in a particular neuron was positively correlated with receptive-field size and with retinal eccentricity in both MT and V1. The maximum spatial interval was, on average, three times as large in MT as in V1. The maximum temporal interval for which we obtained directional interactions was similar in MT and V1 and did not vary with receptive-field size or eccentricity. The maximum spatial interval for directional interactions as measured with flashed stimuli was positively correlated with the maximum speed of smooth motion that yielded directional responses. MT neurons were directionally selective for higher speeds than were V1 neurons. These observations indicate that the large receptive fields found in MT permit directional interactions over longer distances than do the more limited receptive fields of V1 neurons. A functional advantage is thereby conferred on MT neurons because they detect directional differences for higher speeds than do V1 neurons. Recent psychophysical studies have measured the spatial and temporal limits for the perception of apparent motion in sequentially flashed visual displays. A comparison of the psychophysical results with our physiological data indicates that the spatiotemporal limits for perception are similar to the limits for direction selectivity in MT neurons but differ markedly from those for V1 neurons. These observations suggest a correspondence between neuronal responses in MT and the short-range process of apparent motion.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. A. Orban Higher Order Visual Processing in Macaque Extrastriate Cortex Physiol Rev, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 59 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Livingstone and B. R. Conway Contrast Affects Speed Tuning, Space-Time Slant, and Receptive-Field Organization of Simple Cells in Macaque V1 J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 849 - 857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Pack, B. R. Conway, R. T. Born, and M. S. Livingstone Spatiotemporal Structure of Nonlinear Subunits in Macaque Visual Cortex J. Neurosci., January 18, 2006; 26(3): 893 - 907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Churchland, N. J. Priebe, and S. G. Lisberger Comparison of the Spatial Limits on Direction Selectivity in Visual Areas MT and V1 J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2005; 93(3): 1235 - 1245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Wegener, W. A. Freiwald, and A. K. Kreiter The Influence of Sustained Selective Attention on Stimulus Selectivity in Macaque Visual Area MT J. Neurosci., July 7, 2004; 24(27): 6106 - 6114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Priebe, M. M. Churchland, and S. G. Lisberger Constraints on the Source of Short-Term Motion Adaptation in Macaque Area MT. I. The Role of Input and Intrinsic Mechanisms J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2002; 88(1): 354 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Churchland and S. G. Lisberger Shifts in the Population Response in the Middle Temporal Visual Area Parallel Perceptual and Motor Illusions Produced by Apparent Motion J. Neurosci., December 1, 2001; 21(23): 9387 - 9402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Priebe, M. M. Churchland, and S. G. Lisberger Reconstruction of Target Speed for the Guidance of Pursuit Eye Movements J. Neurosci., May 1, 2001; 21(9): 3196 - 3206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Busettini, E. J. Fitzgibbon, and F. A. Miles Short-Latency Disparity Vergence in Humans J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2001; 85(3): 1129 - 1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Churchland and S. G. Lisberger Apparent Motion Produces Multiple Deficits in Visually Guided Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements of Monkeys J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 216 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. de Oliveira, A. Thiele, and K.-P. Hoffmann Synchronization of Neuronal Activity during Stimulus Expectation in a Direction Discrimination Task J. Neurosci., December 1, 1997; 17(23): 9248 - 9260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Barlow and S. P. Tripathy Correspondence Noise and Signal Pooling in the Detection of Coherent Visual Motion J. Neurosci., October 15, 1997; 17(20): 7954 - 7966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Greenlee and A. T. Smith Detection and Discrimination of First- and Second-Order Motion in Patients with Unilateral Brain Damage J. Neurosci., January 15, 1997; 17(2): 804 - 818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |