JN Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 55: 1407-1423, 1986;
0022-3077/86 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cole, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Abbs, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cole, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Abbs, J. H.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 55, Issue 6 1407-1423, Copyright © 1986 by APS


ARTICLES

Coordination of three-joint digit movements for rapid finger-thumb grasp

K. J. Cole and J. H. Abbs

Human thumb and index finger kinematics were examined for multiple repetitions of a simple grasp task as a means to evaluate motor planning and execution of these important hand movements. Subjects generated a rapid (approximately 90-ms duration) pinch movement of the index finger and thumb from an open-hand position. Approximately 400 repetitions were obtained from four naive subjects. The two-dimensional trajectory of the fingertip and the angular positions of the metacarpophalangeal (MP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints of the index finger were recorded along with the angular position of the thumb interphalangeal joint (TH). Individual joint angular positions were transduced using planar electrogoniometers of an exoskeletal linkage design. Except for consistent single-peaked joint angle and digit trajectory velocity profiles, most kinematic features of the grasp varied considerably across trials, including fingertip spatial position at contact, specific finger paths, finger and thumb path distances, finger and thumb peak tangential velocities, and 5) individual joint rotation magnitudes and peak velocities. However, this kinematic variability was not random. Variable TH angular positioning was paralleled by complementary two-dimensional variations in the finger path. These fingertip adjustments were accomplished by actively controlled, reciprocal angular positioning of the MP and PIP joints. Specifically, with natural reductions in thumb flexion, MP flexion was greater while PIP flexion was reduced and vice versa. These adjustments acted to minimize variations in the point contact of the finger on the thumb and yielded a robust and seemingly natural preference for finger-thumb contact at the more distal surfaces of the digits. The kinematic variability was not due to the finger and thumb movements being controlled independently of digit contact. The variable appositional movements of the finger and thumb and the associated contact force were generated as a single action. This was indicated by an absence of kinematic or force adjustments after contact, smooth digit trajectories with a single peak in their tangential velocities, and finger-thumb contact that consistently occurred well after peak velocity. Likewise, because the variability in the kinematics of the grasp was systematic, it apparently was not due simply to sloppiness or noise in motor execution.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. Guigon, P. Baraduc, and M. Desmurget
Computational Motor Control: Redundancy and Invariance
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 331 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. Ansuini, M. Santello, S. Massaccesi, and U. Castiello
Effects of End-Goal on Hand Shaping
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2006; 95(4): 2456 - 2465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. M. Mosier, R. A. Scheidt, S. Acosta, and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi
Remapping Hand Movements in a Novel Geometrical Environment
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 4362 - 4372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. V. Grinyagin, E. V. Biryukova, and M. A. Maier
Kinematic and Dynamic Synergies of Human Precision-Grip Movements
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2284 - 2294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
D. S. Reisman and J. P. Scholz
Aspects of joint coordination are preserved during pointing in persons with post-stroke hemiparesis
Brain, November 1, 2003; 126(11): 2510 - 2527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
H. P. Goodkin and W. T. Thach
Cerebellar Control of Constrained and Unconstrained Movements. I. Nuclear Inactivation
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2003; 89(2): 884 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. A. Martin, S. A. Norris, B. E. Greger, and W. T. Thach
Dynamic Coordination of Body Parts During Prism Adaptation
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 1685 - 1694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. K. O. Burstedt, J. R. Flanagan, and R. S. Johansson
Control of Grasp Stability in Humans Under Different Frictional Conditions During Multidigit Manipulation
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1999; 82(5): 2393 - 2405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. V. Adamovich, M. B. Berkinblit, O. Fookson, and H. Poizner
Pointing in 3D Space to Remembered Targets. I. Kinesthetic Versus Visual Target Presentation
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1998; 79(6): 2833 - 2846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Santello and J. F. Soechting
Gradual Molding of the Hand to Object Contours
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 1998; 79(3): 1307 - 1320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online