JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 57: 819-834, 1987;
0022-3077/87 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buno, W.
Right arrow Articles by Barrio, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buno, W., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Barrio, L.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 57, Issue 3 819-834, Copyright © 1987 by APS


ARTICLES

Modulation of pacemaker activity by IPSP and brief length perturbations in the crayfish stretch receptor

W. Buno Jr, J. Fuentes and L. Barrio

We have studied the influences of brief stretches and releases and of inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) on pacemaker activity of the crayfish stretch receptor (RM1). Stimuli shift or reset the ongoing rhythm. Resettings were different if evaluated in interspike intervals containing perturbations, or in succeeding ones, and are referred to as early and late, respectively. Early resetting revealed that stretches and releases or IPSPs advance and delay, respectively, the next spike. With small stretches and releases or IPSPs, effects depend on the timing of the perturbation relative to the previous spike or phase, but above a characteristic mechanical perturbation amplitude the next spike fires at a fixed latency, invariant with the phase. Of particular interest was the finding that during late resetting the first successive intervals following stretches and releases or IPSPs were longer and shorter, respectively, than the period. This led, in approximately 50% of the cases, to a gradual recovery of the original pacemaker beat in the sense that spikes fire timed as if the early rhythm shift had not occurred. In conclusion, the recent firing history is essential in determining the RM1's response. The receptor's sensitivity is a complex nonlinear and periodic function of the pacemaker activity, and the response is due to interactions between pacemaker- and perturbation-induced transmembrane ionic currents. Although several alternative mechanisms may underly beat recovery, the results suggest that at least two coupled oscillators, one perturbable and the other not, provide a better explanation than a single oscillator. The physiological significance of resettings is unknown, but the early rhythm shift may synchronize RM1s in several segments when the animal's tail is moved, and conversely recovery would reduce synchrony, with obvious influences on shared postsynaptic neurons.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
M. Stiber
Spike Timing Precision and Neural Error Correction: Local Behavior
Neural Comput., July 1, 2005; 17(7): 1577 - 1601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online