JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 57: 1686-1704, 1987;
0022-3077/87 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kajander, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Giesler, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kajander, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Giesler, G. J., Jr

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 57, Issue 6 1686-1704, Copyright © 1987 by APS


ARTICLES

Responses of neurons in the lateral cervical nucleus of the cat to noxious cutaneous stimulation

K. C. Kajander and G. J. Giesler Jr

The majority of neurons at the origin of the spinocervical tract are driven by noxious stimulation of their receptive fields. Surprisingly, previous studies have encountered only a small percentage of nociceptive neurons within the terminus of the spinocervical tract, the lateral cervical nucleus (LCN). To determine if previous reports have underestimated the proportion of nociceptive LCN neurons, 129 neurons within the nucleus were physiologically identified and examined in cats prepared using three different methods. Fifty-nine percent of the neurons studied in unanesthetized cats that were decerebrated and spinalized responded either differentially or exclusively to noxious mechanical stimulation of the skin within discrete receptive fields. LCN neurons also gave accelerating responses to increasingly more intense noxious thermal stimuli. LCN neurons are, therefore, capable of coding both the intensity and location of noxious stimuli. Only 6% of LCN neurons responded to noxious cutaneous stimuli in unanesthetized, decerebrated cats in which the spinal cord was intact. Only 4% of LCN neurons in intact urethan-anesthetized cats were driven by noxious stimulation. Several previous studies of the LCN have been performed in cats that were deeply anesthetized with barbiturates. Therefore, the effects of barbiturates on the nociceptive responses of LCN neurons were determined. Subanesthetic doses of intravenously administered barbiturates reduced or eliminated the responses of nociceptive LCN neurons to noxious thermal stimuli in decerebrated and spinalized cats. Responses to innocuous mechanical stimuli by these neurons were not blocked by barbiturates. Nociceptive LCN neurons in decerebrated and spinalized cats were somatotopically organized. Neurons with forelimb receptive fields were located in the ventromedial half of the LCN; neurons with hindlimb receptive fields were located in the dorsolateral half of the nucleus. This report and previous studies of the spinocervical tract suggest that the spinocervicothalamic pathway is capable of playing an important role in nociception.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. T. Francis, S. Xu, and J. K. Chapin
Proprioceptive and Cutaneous Representations in the Rat Ventral Posterolateral Thalamus
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2291 - 2304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online