JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 59: 1314-1330, 1988;
0022-3077/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marlin, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Cynader, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marlin, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Cynader, M. S.

Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol 59, Issue 4 1314-1330, Copyright © 1988 by APS


ARTICLES

Direction-selective adaptation in simple and complex cells in cat striate cortex

S. G. Marlin, S. J. Hasan and M. S. Cynader
Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

1. The selectivity of adaptation to unidirectional motion was examined in neurons of the cat striate cortex. Following prolonged stimulation with a unidirectional high-contrast grating, the responsivity of cortical neurons was reduced. In many units this decrease was restricted to the direction of prior stimulation. This selective adaptation produced changes in the degree of direction selectivity of the cortical units (as measured by the ratio of the response to motion in the preferred direction to that in the nonpreferred direction). 2. The initial strength of the directional preference of a given cortical unit did not determine the degree of direction-selective adaptation. Indeed, even non-direction-selective units could exhibit pronounced direction-selective adaptation. The degree of direction-selective adaptation was also independent of the overall decrease in responsivity during adaptation. 3. There was no difference between simple and complex cells in the total amount of adaptation observed. The selectivity of the adaptation, however, did differ between these two cell types. As a group, simple cells showed significant direction-selective adaptation, whereas complex cells did not. The directional preference of most simple cells decreased following preferred direction adaptation and many highly direction selective simple cells became non-direction selective. In addition, simple cells became significantly more direction selective following nonpreferred direction adaptation. 4. Some complex cells also demonstrated direction-selective adaptation. There was, however, much more variability among complex cells than simple cells. Some complex cells actually increased direction selectivity following preferred direction adaptation. These differences between simple and complex cells suggest that changes in direction selectivity following unidirectional adaptation are not due to simple neuronal fatigue of the unit being recorded, but depend on selective adaptation of afferent inputs to the unit. 5. The spontaneous activity of many cortical neurons decreased following preferred direction adaptation but increased following adaptation in the nonpreferred direction. The response to a stationary grating also decreased following preferred direction adaptation. However, there was very little change in the response to a stationary grating following adaptation in the nonpreferred direction.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. Zhang, E. L. Smith III, and Y. M. Chino
Postnatal Development of Onset Transient Responses in Macaque V1 and V2 Neurons
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1476 - 1487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Kohn
Visual Adaptation: Physiology, Mechanisms, and Functional Benefits
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2007; 97(5): 3155 - 3164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
H. Yao and Y. Dan
Synaptic Learning Rules, Cortical Circuits, and Visual Function
Neuroscientist, June 1, 2005; 11(3): 206 - 216.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. Yao, Y. Shen, and Y. Dan
Intracortical mechanism of stimulus-timing-dependent plasticity in visual cortical orientation tuning
PNAS, April 6, 2004; 101(14): 5081 - 5086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Y.-X. Fu, Y. Shen, H. Gao, and Y. Dan
Asymmetry in Visual Cortical Circuits Underlying Motion-Induced Perceptual Mislocalization
J. Neurosci., March 3, 2004; 24(9): 2165 - 2171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
B. Roerig, B. Chen, and J. P.-Y. Kao
Different Inhibitory Synaptic Input Patterns in Excitatory and Inhibitory Layer 4 Neurons of Ferret Visual Cortex
Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2003; 13(4): 350 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Kurtz, V. Durr, and M. Egelhaaf
Dendritic Calcium Accumulation Associated With Direction-Selective Adaptation in Visual Motion-Sensitive Neurons In Vivo
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2000; 84(4): 1914 - 1923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. V. Sanchez-Vives, L. G. Nowak, and D. A. McCormick
Membrane Mechanisms Underlying Contrast Adaptation in Cat Area 17 In Vivo
J. Neurosci., June 1, 2000; 20(11): 4267 - 4285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. V. Sanchez-Vives, L. G. Nowak, and D. A. McCormick
Cellular Mechanisms of Long-Lasting Adaptation in Visual Cortical Neurons In Vitro
J. Neurosci., June 1, 2000; 20(11): 4286 - 4299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online